-
1 Bibliography
■ Aitchison, J. (1987). Noam Chomsky: Consensus and controversy. New York: Falmer Press.■ Anderson, J. R. (1980). Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Anderson, J. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications (4th ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman.■ Archilochus (1971). In M. L. West (Ed.), Iambi et elegi graeci (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.■ Armstrong, D. M. (1990). The causal theory of the mind. In W. G. Lycan (Ed.), Mind and cognition: A reader (pp. 37-47). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell. (Originally published in 1981 in The nature of mind and other essays, Ithaca, NY: University Press).■ Atkins, P. W. (1992). Creation revisited. Oxford: W. H. Freeman & Company.■ Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Bacon, F. (1878). Of the proficience and advancement of learning divine and human. In The works of Francis Bacon (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Hurd & Houghton.■ Bacon, R. (1928). Opus majus (Vol. 2). R. B. Burke (Trans.). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.■ Bar-Hillel, Y. (1960). The present status of automatic translation of languages. In F. L. Alt (Ed.), Advances in computers (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.■ Barr, A., & E. A. Feigenbaum (Eds.) (1981). The handbook of artificial intelligence (Vol. 1). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.■ Barr, A., & E. A. Feigenbaum (Eds.) (1982). The handbook of artificial intelligence (Vol. 2). Los Altos, CA: William Kaufman.■ Barron, F. X. (1963). The needs for order and for disorder as motives in creative activity. In C. W. Taylor & F. X. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its rec ognition and development (pp. 153-160). New York: Wiley.■ Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Bartley, S. H. (1969). Principles of perception. London: Harper & Row.■ Barzun, J. (1959). The house of intellect. New York: Harper & Row.■ Beach, F. A., D. O. Hebb, C. T. Morgan & H. W. Nissen (Eds.) (1960). The neu ropsychology of Lashley. New York: McGraw-Hill.■ Berkeley, G. (1996). Principles of human knowledge: Three Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Originally published in 1710.)■ Berlin, I. (1953). The hedgehog and the fox: An essay on Tolstoy's view of history. NY: Simon & Schuster.■ Bierwisch, J. (1970). Semantics. In J. Lyons (Ed.), New horizons in linguistics. Baltimore: Penguin Books.■ Black, H. C. (1951). Black's law dictionary. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.■ Bloom, A. (1981). The linguistic shaping of thought: A study in the impact of language on thinking in China and the West. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.■ Bobrow, D. G., & D. A. Norman (1975). Some principles of memory schemata. In D. G. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding: Stud ies in Cognitive Science (pp. 131-149). New York: Academic Press.■ Boden, M. A. (1977). Artificial intelligence and natural man. New York: Basic Books.■ Boden, M. A. (1981). Minds and mechanisms. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.■ Boden, M. A. (1990a). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London: Cardinal.■ Boden, M. A. (1990b). The philosophy of artificial intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.■ Boden, M. A. (1994). Precis of The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. Behavioral and brain sciences 17, 519-570.■ Boden, M. (1996). Creativity. In M. Boden (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.■ Bolter, J. D. (1984). Turing's man: Western culture in the computer age. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.■ Bolton, N. (1972). The psychology of thinking. London: Methuen.■ Bourne, L. E. (1973). Some forms of cognition: A critical analysis of several papers. In R. Solso (Ed.), Contemporary issues in cognitive psychology (pp. 313324). Loyola Symposium on Cognitive Psychology (Chicago 1972). Washington, DC: Winston.■ Bransford, J. D., N. S. McCarrell, J. J. Franks & K. E. Nitsch (1977). Toward unexplaining memory. In R. Shaw & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 431-466). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Breger, L. (1981). Freud's unfinished journey. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.■ Brehmer, B. (1986). In one word: Not from experience. In H. R. Arkes & K. Hammond (Eds.), Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader (pp. 705-719). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Bresnan, J. (1978). A realistic transformational grammar. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan & G. A. Miller (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 1-59). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Brislin, R. W., W. J. Lonner & R. M. Thorndike (Eds.) (1973). Cross- cultural research methods. New York: Wiley.■ Bronowski, J. (1977). A sense of the future: Essays in natural philosophy. P. E. Ariotti with R. Bronowski (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Bronowski, J. (1978). The origins of knowledge and imagination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.■ Brown, R. O. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Brown, T. (1970). Lectures on the philosophy of the human mind. In R. Brown (Ed.), Between Hume and Mill: An anthology of British philosophy- 1749- 1843 (pp. 330-387). New York: Random House/Modern Library.■ Bruner, J. S., J. Goodnow & G. Austin (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.■ Calvin, W. H. (1990). The cerebral symphony: Seashore reflections on the structure of consciousness. New York: Bantam.■ Campbell, J. (1982). Grammatical man: Information, entropy, language, and life. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Campbell, J. (1989). The improbable machine. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Carlyle, T. (1966). On heroes, hero- worship and the heroic in history. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. (Originally published in 1841.)■ Carnap, R. (1959). The elimination of metaphysics through logical analysis of language [Ueberwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache]. In A. J. Ayer (Ed.), Logical positivism (pp. 60-81) A. Pap (Trans). New York: Free Press. (Originally published in 1932.)■ Cassirer, E. (1946). Language and myth. New York: Harper and Brothers. Reprinted. New York: Dover Publications, 1953.■ Cattell, R. B., & H. J. Butcher (1970). Creativity and personality. In P. E. Vernon (Ed.), Creativity. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.■ Caudill, M., & C. Butler (1990). Naturally intelligent systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Chandrasekaran, B. (1990). What kind of information processing is intelligence? A perspective on AI paradigms and a proposal. In D. Partridge & R. Wilks (Eds.), The foundations of artificial intelligence: A sourcebook (pp. 14-46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Charniak, E., & McDermott, D. (1985). Introduction to artificial intelligence. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.■ Chase, W. G., & H. A. Simon (1988). The mind's eye in chess. In A. Collins & E. E. Smith (Eds.), Readings in cognitive science: A perspective from psychology and artificial intelligence (pp. 461-493). San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann.■ Cheney, D. L., & R. M. Seyfarth (1990). How monkeys see the world: Inside the mind of another species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.■ Chi, M.T.H., R. Glaser & E. Rees (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 7-73). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. Janua Linguarum.■ Chomsky, N. (1964). A transformational approach to syntax. In J. A. Fodor & J. J. Katz (Eds.), The structure of language: Readings in the philosophy of lan guage (pp. 211-245). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.■ Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and mind (enlarged ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.■ Chomsky, N. (1979). Language and responsibility. New York: Pantheon.■ Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger Special Studies.■ Churchland, P. (1979). Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.■ Churchland, P. M. (1989). A neurocomputational perspective: The nature of mind and the structure of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Clark, A. (1996). Philosophical Foundations. In M. A. Boden (Ed.), Artificial in telligence (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.■ Clark, H. H., & T. B. Carlson (1981). Context for comprehension. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 9, pp. 313-330). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Clarke, A. C. (1984). Profiles of the future: An inquiry into the limits of the possible. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.■ Claxton, G. (1980). Cognitive psychology: A suitable case for what sort of treatment? In G. Claxton (Ed.), Cognitive psychology: New directions (pp. 1-25). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.■ Code, M. (1985). Order and organism. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.■ Collingwood, R. G. (1972). The idea of history. New York: Oxford University Press.■ Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self- esteem. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Copland, A. (1952). Music and imagination. London: Oxford University Press.■ Coren, S. (1994). The intelligence of dogs. New York: Bantam Books.■ Cottingham, J. (Ed.) (1996). Western philosophy: An anthology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.■ Cox, C. (1926). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.■ Craik, K.J.W. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). New York: HarperCollins.■ Cronbach, L. J., & R. E. Snow (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods. New York: Irvington. Paperback edition, 1981.■ Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). The evolving self. New York: Harper Perennial.■ Culler, J. (1976). Ferdinand de Saussure. New York: Penguin Books.■ Curtius, E. R. (1973). European literature and the Latin Middle Ages. W. R. Trask (Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ D'Alembert, J.L.R. (1963). Preliminary discourse to the encyclopedia of Diderot. R. N. Schwab (Trans.). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.■ Dampier, W. C. (1966). A history of modern science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Darwin, C. (1911). The life and letters of Charles Darwin (Vol. 1). Francis Darwin (Ed.). New York: Appleton.■ Davidson, D. (1970) Mental events. In L. Foster & J. W. Swanson (Eds.), Experience and theory (pp. 79-101). Amherst: University of Massachussetts Press.■ Davies, P. (1995). About time: Einstein's unfinished revolution. New York: Simon & Schuster/Touchstone.■ Davis, R., & J. J. King (1977). An overview of production systems. In E. Elcock & D. Michie (Eds.), Machine intelligence 8. Chichester, England: Ellis Horwood.■ Davis, R., & D. B. Lenat (1982). Knowledge- based systems in artificial intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.■ Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype: The gene as the unit of selection. Oxford: W. H. Freeman.■ deKleer, J., & J. S. Brown (1983). Assumptions and ambiguities in mechanistic mental models (1983). In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental modes (pp. 155-190). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Dennett, D. C. (1978a). Brainstorms: Philosophical essays on mind and psychology. Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books.■ Dennett, D. C. (1978b). Toward a cognitive theory of consciousness. In D. C. Dennett, Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology. Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books.■ Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin's dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon & Schuster/Touchstone.■ Descartes, R. (1897-1910). Traite de l'homme. In Oeuvres de Descartes (Vol. 11, pp. 119-215). Paris: Charles Adam & Paul Tannery. (Originally published in 1634.)■ Descartes, R. (1950). Discourse on method. L. J. Lafleur (Trans.). New York: Liberal Arts Press. (Originally published in 1637.)■ Descartes, R. (1951). Meditation on first philosophy. L. J. Lafleur (Trans.). New York: Liberal Arts Press. (Originally published in 1641.)■ Descartes, R. (1955). The philosophical works of Descartes. E. S. Haldane and G.R.T. Ross (Trans.). New York: Dover. (Originally published in 1911 by Cambridge University Press.)■ Descartes, R. (1967). Discourse on method (Pt. V). In E. S. Haldane and G.R.T. Ross (Eds.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 1, pp. 106-118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1637.)■ Descartes, R. (1970a). Discourse on method. In E. S. Haldane & G.R.T. Ross (Eds.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 1, pp. 181-200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1637.)■ Descartes, R. (1970b). Principles of philosophy. In E. S. Haldane & G.R.T. Ross (Eds.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 1, pp. 178-291). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1644.)■ Descartes, R. (1984). Meditations on first philosophy. In J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff & D. Murduch (Trans.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1641.)■ Descartes, R. (1986). Meditations on first philosophy. J. Cottingham (Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1641 as Med itationes de prima philosophia.)■ deWulf, M. (1956). An introduction to scholastic philosophy. Mineola, NY: Dover Books.■ Dixon, N. F. (1981). Preconscious processing. London: Wiley.■ Doyle, A. C. (1986). The Boscombe Valley mystery. In Sherlock Holmes: The com plete novels and stories (Vol. 1). New York: Bantam.■ Dreyfus, H., & S. Dreyfus (1986). Mind over machine. New York: Free Press.■ Dreyfus, H. L. (1972). What computers can't do: The limits of artificial intelligence (revised ed.). New York: Harper & Row.■ Dreyfus, H. L., & S. E. Dreyfus (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: Free Press.■ Edelman, G. M. (1992). Bright air, brilliant fire: On the matter of the mind. New York: Basic Books.■ Ehrenzweig, A. (1967). The hidden order of art. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.■ Einstein, A., & L. Infeld (1938). The evolution of physics. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Eisenstein, S. (1947). Film sense. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.■ Everdell, W. R. (1997). The first moderns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.■ Eysenck, M. W. (1977). Human memory: Theory, research and individual difference. Oxford: Pergamon.■ Eysenck, M. W. (1982). Attention and arousal: Cognition and performance. Berlin: Springer.■ Eysenck, M. W. (1984). A handbook of cognitive psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Fancher, R. E. (1979). Pioneers of psychology. New York: W. W. Norton.■ Farrell, B. A. (1981). The standing of psychoanalysis. New York: Oxford University Press.■ Feldman, D. H. (1980). Beyond universals in cognitive development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.■ Fetzer, J. H. (1996). Philosophy and cognitive science (2nd ed.). New York: Paragon House.■ Finke, R. A. (1990). Creative imagery: Discoveries and inventions in visualization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Flanagan, O. (1991). The science of the mind. Cambridge MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Frege, G. (1972). Conceptual notation. T. W. Bynum (Trans.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Originally published in 1879.)■ Frege, G. (1979). Logic. In H. Hermes, F. Kambartel & F. Kaulbach (Eds.), Gottlob Frege: Posthumous writings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Originally published in 1879-1891.)■ Freud, S. (1959). Creative writers and day-dreaming. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 9, pp. 143-153). London: Hogarth Press.■ Freud, S. (1966). Project for a scientific psychology. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The stan dard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 1, pp. 295-398). London: Hogarth Press. (Originally published in 1950 as Aus den AnfaЁngen der Psychoanalyse, in London by Imago Publishing.)■ Freud, S. (1976). Lecture 18-Fixation to traumas-the unconscious. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 16, p. 285). London: Hogarth Press.■ Galileo, G. (1990). Il saggiatore [The assayer]. In S. Drake (Ed.), Discoveries and opinions of Galileo. New York: Anchor Books. (Originally published in 1623.)■ Gassendi, P. (1970). Letter to Descartes. In "Objections and replies." In E. S. Haldane & G.R.T. Ross (Eds.), The philosophical works of Descartes (Vol. 2, pp. 179-240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Originally published in 1641.)■ Gazzaniga, M. S. (1988). Mind matters: How mind and brain interact to create our conscious lives. Boston: Houghton Mifflin in association with MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Genesereth, M. R., & N. J. Nilsson (1987). Logical foundations of artificial intelligence. Palo Alto, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.■ Ghiselin, B. (1952). The creative process. New York: Mentor.■ Ghiselin, B. (1985). The creative process. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Originally published in 1952.)■ Gilhooly, K. J. (1996). Thinking: Directed, undirected and creative (3rd ed.). London: Academic Press.■ Glass, A. L., K. J. Holyoak & J. L. Santa (1979). Cognition. Reading, MA: AddisonWesley.■ Goody, J. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Gruber, H. E. (1980). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.■ Gruber, H. E., & S. Davis (1988). Inching our way up Mount Olympus: The evolving systems approach to creative thinking. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Guthrie, E. R. (1972). The psychology of learning. New York: Harper. (Originally published in 1935.)■ Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon Press.■ Hadamard, J. (1945). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Hand, D. J. (1985). Artificial intelligence and psychiatry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Harris, M. (1981). The language myth. London: Duckworth.■ Haugeland, J. (Ed.) (1981). Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Haugeland, J. (1981a). The nature and plausibility of cognitivism. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence (pp. 243-281). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Haugeland, J. (1981b). Semantic engines: An introduction to mind design. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence (pp. 1-34). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Haugeland, J. (1985). Artificial intelligence: The very idea. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Hawkes, T. (1977). Structuralism and semiotics. Berkeley: University of California Press.■ Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organisation of behaviour. New York: Wiley.■ Hebb, D. O. (1958). A textbook of psychology. Philadelphia: Saunders.■ Hegel, G.W.F. (1910). The phenomenology of mind. J. B. Baille (Trans.). London: Sonnenschein. (Originally published as Phaenomenologie des Geistes, 1807.)■ Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and philosophy. New York: Harper & Row.■ Hempel, C. G. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall.■ Herman, A. (1997). The idea of decline in Western history. New York: Free Press.■ Herrnstein, R. J., & E. G. Boring (Eds.) (1965). A source book in the history of psy chology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Herzmann, E. (1964). Mozart's creative process. In P. H. Lang (Ed.), The creative world of Mozart (pp. 17-30). London: Oldbourne Press.■ Hilgard, E. R. (1957). Introduction to psychology. London: Methuen.■ Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan. London: Crooke.■ Holliday, S. G., & M. J. Chandler (1986). Wisdom: Explorations in adult competence. Basel, Switzerland: Karger.■ Horn, J. L. (1986). In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 3). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.■ Hull, C. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.■ Hume, D. (1955). An inquiry concerning human understanding. New York: Liberal Arts Press. (Originally published in 1748.)■ Hume, D. (1975). An enquiry concerning human understanding. In L. A. SelbyBigge (Ed.), Hume's enquiries (3rd. ed., revised P. H. Nidditch). Oxford: Clarendon. (Spelling and punctuation revised.) (Originally published in 1748.)■ Hume, D. (1978). A treatise of human nature. L. A. Selby-Bigge (Ed.), Hume's enquiries (3rd. ed., revised P. H. Nidditch). Oxford: Clarendon. (With some modifications of spelling and punctuation.) (Originally published in 1690.)■ Hunt, E. (1973). The memory we must have. In R. C. Schank & K. M. Colby (Eds.), Computer models of thought and language. (pp. 343-371) San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Husserl, E. (1960). Cartesian meditations. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.■ Inhelder, B., & J. Piaget (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books. (Originally published in 1955 as De la logique de l'enfant a` la logique de l'adolescent. [Paris: Presses Universitaire de France])■ James, W. (1890a). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Dover Books.■ James, W. (1890b). The principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt.■ Jevons, W. S. (1900). The principles of science (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.■ Johnson, G. (1986). Machinery of the mind: Inside the new science of artificial intelli gence. New York: Random House.■ Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Toward a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1988). The computer and the mind: An introduction to cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Jones, E. (1961). The life and work of Sigmund Freud. L. Trilling & S. Marcus (Eds.). London: Hogarth.■ Jones, R. V. (1985). Complementarity as a way of life. In A. P. French & P. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Niels Bohr: A centenary volume. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Kant, I. (1933). Critique of Pure Reason (2nd ed.). N. K. Smith (Trans.). London: Macmillan. (Originally published in 1781 as Kritik der reinen Vernunft.)■ Kant, I. (1891). Solution of the general problems of the Prolegomena. In E. Belfort (Trans.), Kant's Prolegomena. London: Bell. (With minor modifications.) (Originally published in 1783.)■ Katona, G. (1940). Organizing and memorizing: Studies in the psychology of learning and teaching. New York: Columbia University Press.■ Kaufman, A. S. (1979). Intelligent testing with the WISC-R. New York: Wiley.■ Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. New York: Arkana (Penguin).■ Kohlberg, L. (1971). From is to ought. In T. Mischel (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology. (pp. 151-235) New York: Academic Press.■ KoЁhler, W. (1925). The mentality of apes. New York: Liveright.■ KoЁhler, W. (1927). The mentality of apes (2nd ed.). Ella Winter (Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.■ KoЁhler, W. (1930). Gestalt psychology. London: G. Bell.■ KoЁhler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright.■ KoЁhler, W. (1969). The task of Gestalt psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.■ Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.■ Langer, S. (1962). Philosophical sketches. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.■ Langley, P., H. A. Simon, G. L. Bradshaw & J. M. Zytkow (1987). Scientific dis covery: Computational explorations of the creative process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior, the Hixon Symposium (pp. 112-146) New York: Wiley.■ LeDoux, J. E., & W. Hirst (1986). Mind and brain: Dialogues in cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Lehnert, W. (1978). The process of question answering. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Leiber, J. (1991). Invitation to cognitive science. Oxford: Blackwell.■ Lenat, D. B., & G. Harris (1978). Designing a rule system that searches for scientific discoveries. In D. A. Waterman & F. Hayes-Roth (Eds.), Pattern directed inference systems (pp. 25-52) New York: Academic Press.■ Levenson, T. (1995). Measure for measure: A musical history of science. New York: Touchstone. (Originally published in 1994.)■ Leґvi-Strauss, C. (1963). Structural anthropology. C. Jacobson & B. Grundfest Schoepf (Trans.). New York: Basic Books. (Originally published in 1958.)■ Levine, M. W., & J. M. Schefner (1981). Fundamentals of sensation and perception. London: Addison-Wesley.■ Lewis, C. I. (1946). An analysis of knowledge and valuation. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.■ Lighthill, J. (1972). A report on artificial intelligence. Unpublished manuscript, Science Research Council.■ Lipman, M., A. M. Sharp & F. S. Oscanyan (1980). Philosophy in the classroom. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.■ Lippmann, W. (1965). Public opinion. New York: Free Press. (Originally published in 1922.)■ Locke, J. (1956). An essay concerning human understanding. Chicago: Henry Regnery Co. (Originally published in 1690.)■ Locke, J. (1975). An essay concerning human understanding. P. H. Nidditch (Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon. (Originally published in 1690.) (With spelling and punctuation modernized and some minor modifications of phrasing.)■ Lopate, P. (1994). The art of the personal essay. New York: Doubleday/Anchor Books.■ Lorimer, F. (1929). The growth of reason. London: Kegan Paul. Machlup, F., & U. Mansfield (Eds.) (1983). The study of information. New York: Wiley.■ Manguel, A. (1996). A history of reading. New York: Viking.■ Markey, J. F. (1928). The symbolic process. London: Kegan Paul.■ Martin, R. M. (1969). On Ziff's "Natural and formal languages." In S. Hook (Ed.), Language and philosophy: A symposium (pp. 249-263). New York: New York University Press.■ Mazlish, B. (1993). The fourth discontinuity: the co- evolution of humans and machines. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.■ McCarthy, J., & P. J. Hayes (1969). Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In B. Meltzer & D. Michie (Eds.), Machine intelligence 4. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.■ McClelland, J. L., D. E. Rumelhart & G. E. Hinton (1986). The appeal of parallel distributed processing. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the mi crostructure of cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 3-40). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/ Bradford Books.■ McCorduck, P. (1979). Machines who think. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ McLaughlin, T. (1970). Music and communication. London: Faber & Faber.■ Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review 69, 431-436.■ Meehl, P. E., & C. J. Golden (1982). Taxometric methods. In Kendall, P. C., & Butcher, J. N. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 127-182). New York: Wiley.■ Mehler, J., E.C.T. Walker & M. Garrett (Eds.) (1982). Perspectives on mental rep resentation: Experimental and theoretical studies of cognitive processes and ca pacities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Mill, J. S. (1900). A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive: Being a connected view of the principles of evidence and the methods of scientific investigation. London: Longmans, Green.■ Miller, G. A. (1979, June). A very personal history. Talk to the Cognitive Science Workshop, Cambridge, MA.■ Miller, J. (1983). States of mind. New York: Pantheon Books.■ Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211-277). New York: McGrawHill.■ Minsky, M., & S. Papert (1973). Artificial intelligence. Condon Lectures, Oregon State System of Higher Education, Eugene, Oregon.■ Minsky, M. L. (1986). The society of mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Mischel, T. (1976). Psychological explanations and their vicissitudes. In J. K. Cole & W. J. Arnold (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on motivation (Vol. 23). Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.■ Morford, M.P.O., & R. J. Lenardon (1995). Classical mythology (5th ed.). New York: Longman.■ Murdoch, I. (1954). Under the net. New York: Penguin.■ Nagel, E. (1959). Methodological issues in psychoanalytic theory. In S. Hook (Ed.), Psychoanalysis, scientific method, and philosophy: A symposium. New York: New York University Press.■ Nagel, T. (1979). Mortal questions. London: Cambridge University Press.■ Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.■ Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.■ Neisser, U. (1972). Changing conceptions of imagery. In P. W. Sheehan (Ed.), The function and nature of imagery (pp. 233-251). London: Academic Press.■ Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Neisser, U. (1978). Memory: What are the important questions? In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 3-24). London: Academic Press.■ Neisser, U. (1979). The concept of intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & D. K. Detterman (Eds.), Human intelligence: Perspectives on its theory and measurement (pp. 179-190). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.■ Nersessian, N. (1992). How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science (pp. 3-44). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.■ Newell, A. (1973a). Artificial intelligence and the concept of mind. In R. C. Schank & K. M. Colby (Eds.), Computer models of thought and language (pp. 1-60). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Newell, A. (1973b). You can't play 20 questions with nature and win. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 283-310). New York: Academic Press.■ Newell, A., & H. A. Simon (1963). GPS: A program that simulates human thought. In E. A. Feigenbaum & J. Feldman (Eds.), Computers and thought (pp. 279-293). New York & McGraw-Hill.■ Newell, A., & H. A. Simon (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.■ Nietzsche, F. (1966). Beyond good and evil. W. Kaufmann (Trans.). New York: Vintage. (Originally published in 1885.)■ Nilsson, N. J. (1971). Problem- solving methods in artificial intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.■ Nussbaum, M. C. (1978). Aristotle's Princeton University Press. De Motu Anamalium. Princeton, NJ:■ Oersted, H. C. (1920). Thermo-electricity. In Kirstine Meyer (Ed.), H. C. Oersted, Natuurvidenskabelige Skrifter (Vol. 2). Copenhagen: n.p. (Originally published in 1830 in The Edinburgh encyclopaedia.)■ Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen.■ Onians, R. B. (1954). The origins of European thought. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.■ Osgood, C. E. (1960). Method and theory in experimental psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. (Originally published in 1953.)■ Osgood, C. E. (1966). Language universals and psycholinguistics. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (2nd ed., pp. 299-322). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Palmer, R. E. (1969). Hermeneutics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.■ Peirce, C. S. (1934). Some consequences of four incapacities-Man, a sign. In C. Hartsborne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Saunders Peirce (Vol. 5, pp. 185-189). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Penfield, W. (1959). In W. Penfield & L. Roberts, Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Penrose, R. (1994). Shadows of the mind: A search for the missing science of conscious ness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.■ Perkins, D. N. (1981). The mind's best work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Peterfreund, E. (1986). The heuristic approach to psychoanalytic therapy. In■ J. Reppen (Ed.), Analysts at work, (pp. 127-144). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.■ Piaget, J. (1952). The origin of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press. (Originally published in 1936.)■ Piaget, J. (1954). Le langage et les opeґrations intellectuelles. Proble` mes de psycho linguistique. Symposium de l'Association de Psychologie Scientifique de Langue Francёaise. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.■ Piaget, J. (1977). Problems of equilibration. In H. E. Gruber & J. J. Voneche (Eds.), The essential Piaget (pp. 838-841). London: Routlege & Kegan Paul. (Originally published in 1975 as L'eґquilibration des structures cognitives [Paris: Presses Universitaires de France].)■ Piaget, J., & B. Inhelder. (1973). Memory and intelligence. New York: Basic Books.■ Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: Morrow.■ Pinker, S. (1996). Facts about human language relevant to its evolution. In J.-P. Changeux & J. Chavaillon (Eds.), Origins of the human brain. A symposium of the Fyssen foundation (pp. 262-283). Oxford: Clarendon Press. Planck, M. (1949). Scientific autobiography and other papers. F. Gaynor (Trans.). New York: Philosophical Library.■ Planck, M. (1990). Wissenschaftliche Selbstbiographie. W. Berg (Ed.). Halle, Germany: Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina.■ Plato (1892). Meno. In The Dialogues of Plato (B. Jowett, Trans.; Vol. 2). New York: Clarendon. (Originally published circa 380 B.C.)■ Poincareґ, H. (1913). Mathematical creation. In The foundations of science. G. B. Halsted (Trans.). New York: Science Press.■ Poincareґ, H. (1921). The foundations of science: Science and hypothesis, the value of science, science and method. G. B. Halstead (Trans.). New York: Science Press.■ Poincareґ, H. (1929). The foundations of science: Science and hypothesis, the value of science, science and method. New York: Science Press.■ Poincareґ, H. (1952). Science and method. F. Maitland (Trans.) New York: Dover.■ Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.■ Popper, K. (1968). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Harper & Row/Basic Books.■ Popper, K., & J. Eccles (1977). The self and its brain. New York: Springer-Verlag.■ Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.■ Putnam, H. (1975). Mind, language and reality: Philosophical papers (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Putnam, H. (1987). The faces of realism. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.■ Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1981). The imagery debate: Analog media versus tacit knowledge. In N. Block (Ed.), Imagery (pp. 151-206). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984). Computation and cognition: Towards a foundation for cog nitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Quillian, M. R. (1968). Semantic memory. In M. Minsky (Ed.), Semantic information processing (pp. 216-260). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Quine, W.V.O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Rabbitt, P.M.A., & S. Dornic (Eds.). Attention and performance (Vol. 5). London: Academic Press.■ Rawlins, G.J.E. (1997). Slaves of the Machine: The quickening of computer technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.■ Reid, T. (1970). An inquiry into the human mind on the principles of common sense. In R. Brown (Ed.), Between Hume and Mill: An anthology of British philosophy- 1749- 1843 (pp. 151-178). New York: Random House/Modern Library.■ Reitman, W. (1970). What does it take to remember? In D. A. Norman (Ed.), Models of human memory (pp. 470-510). London: Academic Press.■ Ricoeur, P. (1974). Structure and hermeneutics. In D. I. Ihde (Ed.), The conflict of interpretations: Essays in hermeneutics (pp. 27-61). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.■ Robinson, D. N. (1986). An intellectual history of psychology. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.■ Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.■ Rosch, E. (1977). Human categorization. In N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in cross cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1-49) London: Academic Press.■ Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Rosch, E., & B. B. Lloyd (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Rose, S. (1970). The chemistry of life. Baltimore: Penguin Books.■ Rose, S. (1976). The conscious brain (updated ed.). New York: Random House.■ Rose, S. (1993). The making of memory: From molecules to mind. New York: Anchor Books. (Originally published in 1992)■ Roszak, T. (1994). The cult of information: A neo- Luddite treatise on high- tech, artificial intelligence, and the true art of thinking (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.■ Royce, J. R., & W. W. Rozeboom (Eds.) (1972). The psychology of knowing. New York: Gordon & Breach.■ Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Introduction to human information processing. New York: Wiley.■ Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. Bruce & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Rumelhart, D. E., & J. L. McClelland (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Rumelhart, D. E., P. Smolensky, J. L. McClelland & G. E. Hinton (1986). Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDP models. In J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing (Vol. 2, pp. 7-57). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Russell, B. (1927). An outline of philosophy. London: G. Allen & Unwin.■ Russell, B. (1961). History of Western philosophy. London: George Allen & Unwin.■ Russell, B. (1965). How I write. In Portraits from memory and other essays. London: Allen & Unwin.■ Russell, B. (1992). In N. Griffin (Ed.), The selected letters of Bertrand Russell (Vol. 1), The private years, 1884- 1914. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Ryecroft, C. (1966). Psychoanalysis observed. London: Constable.■ Sagan, C. (1978). The dragons of Eden: Speculations on the evolution of human intel ligence. New York: Ballantine Books.■ Salthouse, T. A. (1992). Expertise as the circumvention of human processing limitations. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 172-194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Sanford, A. J. (1987). The mind of man: Models of human understanding. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.■ Sapir, E. (1921). Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.■ Sapir, E. (1964). Culture, language, and personality. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Originally published in 1941.)■ Sapir, E. (1985). The status of linguistics as a science. In D. G. Mandelbaum (Ed.), Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture and personality (pp. 160166). Berkeley: University of California Press. (Originally published in 1929).■ Scardmalia, M., & C. Bereiter (1992). Literate expertise. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 172-194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Schafer, R. (1954). Psychoanalytic interpretation in Rorschach testing. New York: Grune & Stratten.■ Schank, R. C. (1973). Identification of conceptualizations underlying natural language. In R. C. Schank & K. M. Colby (Eds.), Computer models of thought and language (pp. 187-248). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Schank, R. C. (1976). The role of memory in language processing. In C. N. Cofer (Ed.), The structure of human memory. (pp. 162-189) San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Schank, R. C. (1986). Explanation patterns: Understanding mechanically and creatively. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Schank, R. C., & R. P. Abelson (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ SchroЁdinger, E. (1951). Science and humanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Searle, J. R. (1981a). Minds, brains, and programs. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Mind design: Philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence (pp. 282-306). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Searle, J. R. (1981b). Minds, brains and programs. In D. Hofstadter & D. Dennett (Eds.), The mind's I (pp. 353-373). New York: Basic Books.■ Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality. New York: Cambridge University Press.■ Serres, M. (1982). The origin of language: Biology, information theory, and thermodynamics. M. Anderson (Trans.). In J. V. Harari & D. F. Bell (Eds.), Hermes: Literature, science, philosophy (pp. 71-83). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.■ Simon, H. A. (1966). Scientific discovery and the psychology of problem solving. In R. G. Colodny (Ed.), Mind and cosmos: Essays in contemporary science and philosophy (pp. 22-40). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.■ Simon, H. A. (1979). Models of thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.■ Simon, H. A. (1989). The scientist as a problem solver. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert Simon. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Simon, H. A., & C. Kaplan (1989). Foundations of cognitive science. In M. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 1-47). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Simonton, D. K. (1988). Creativity, leadership and chance. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.■ Smith, E. E. (1988). Concepts and thought. In J. Sternberg & E. E. Smith (Eds.), The psychology of human thought (pp. 19-49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Smith, E. E. (1990). Thinking: Introduction. In D. N. Osherson & E. E. Smith (Eds.), Thinking. An invitation to cognitive science. (Vol. 3, pp. 1-2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Socrates. (1958). Meno. In E. H. Warmington & P. O. Rouse (Eds.), Great dialogues of Plato W.H.D. Rouse (Trans.). New York: New American Library. (Original publication date unknown.)■ Solso, R. L. (1974). Theories of retrieval. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology. Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Spencer, H. (1896). The principles of psychology. New York: Appleton-CenturyCrofts.■ Steiner, G. (1975). After Babel: Aspects of language and translation. New York: Oxford University Press.■ Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.■ Sternberg, R. J. (1994). Intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg, Thinking and problem solving. San Diego: Academic Press.■ Sternberg, R. J., & J. E. Davidson (1985). Cognitive development in gifted and talented. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O'Brien (Eds.), The gifted and talented (pp. 103-135). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.■ Storr, A. (1993). The dynamics of creation. New York: Ballantine Books. (Originally published in 1972.)■ Stumpf, S. E. (1994). Philosophy: History and problems (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.■ Sulloway, F. J. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York: Random House/Vintage Books.■ Thorndike, E. L. (1906). Principles of teaching. New York: A. G. Seiler.■ Thorndike, E. L. (1970). Animal intelligence: Experimental studies. Darien, CT: Hafner Publishing Co. (Originally published in 1911.)■ Titchener, E. B. (1910). A textbook of psychology. New York: Macmillan.■ Titchener, E. B. (1914). A primer of psychology. New York: Macmillan.■ Toulmin, S. (1957). The philosophy of science. London: Hutchinson.■ Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organisation of memory. London: Academic Press.■ Turing, A. (1946). In B. E. Carpenter & R. W. Doran (Eds.), ACE reports of 1946 and other papers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Turkle, S. (1984). Computers and the second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon & Schuster.■ Tyler, S. A. (1978). The said and the unsaid: Mind, meaning, and culture. New York: Academic Press.■ van Heijenoort (Ed.) (1967). From Frege to Goedel. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.■ Varela, F. J. (1984). The creative circle: Sketches on the natural history of circularity. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality (pp. 309-324). New York: W. W. Norton.■ Voltaire (1961). On the Penseґs of M. Pascal. In Philosophical letters (pp. 119-146). E. Dilworth (Trans.). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.■ Wagman, M. (1991a). Artificial intelligence and human cognition: A theoretical inter comparison of two realms of intellect. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1991b). Cognitive science and concepts of mind: Toward a general theory of human and artificial intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1993). Cognitive psychology and artificial intelligence: Theory and re search in cognitive science. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1995). The sciences of cognition: Theory and research in psychology and artificial intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1996). Human intellect and cognitive science: Toward a general unified theory of intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1997a). Cognitive science and the symbolic operations of human and artificial intelligence: Theory and research into the intellective processes. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1997b). The general unified theory of intelligence: Central conceptions and specific application to domains of cognitive science. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1998a). Cognitive science and the mind- body problem: From philosophy to psychology to artificial intelligence to imaging of the brain. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1998b). Language and thought in humans and computers: Theory and research in psychology, artificial intelligence, and neural science. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1998c). The ultimate objectives of artificial intelligence: Theoretical and research foundations, philosophical and psychological implications. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (1999). The human mind according to artificial intelligence: Theory, re search, and implications. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wagman, M. (2000). Scientific discovery processes in humans and computers: Theory and research in psychology and artificial intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger.■ Wall, R. (1972). Introduction to mathematical linguistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.■ Wallas, G. (1926). The Art of Thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.■ Wason, P. (1977). Self contradictions. In P. Johnson-Laird & P. Wason (Eds.), Thinking: Readings in cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.■ Wason, P. C., & P. N. Johnson-Laird. (1972). Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.■ Watson, J. (1930). Behaviorism. New York: W. W. Norton.■ Watzlawick, P. (1984). Epilogue. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality. New York: W. W. Norton, 1984.■ Weinberg, S. (1977). The first three minutes: A modern view of the origin of the uni verse. New York: Basic Books.■ Weisberg, R. W. (1986). Creativity: Genius and other myths. New York: W. H. Freeman.■ Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer power and human reason: From judgment to cal culation. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.■ Wertheimer, M. (1945). Productive thinking. New York: Harper & Bros.■ Whitehead, A. N. (1925). Science and the modern world. New York: Macmillan.■ Whorf, B. L. (1956). In J. B. Carroll (Ed.), Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Whyte, L. L. (1962). The unconscious before Freud. New York: Anchor Books.■ Wiener, N. (1954). The human use of human beings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.■ Wiener, N. (1964). God & Golem, Inc.: A comment on certain points where cybernetics impinges on religion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Winograd, T. (1972). Understanding natural language. New York: Academic Press.■ Winston, P. H. (1987). Artificial intelligence: A perspective. In E. L. Grimson & R. S. Patil (Eds.), AI in the 1980s and beyond (pp. 1-12). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.■ Winston, P. H. (Ed.) (1975). The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGrawHill.■ Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.■ Wittgenstein, L. (1958). The blue and brown books. New York: Harper Colophon.■ Woods, W. A. (1975). What's in a link: Foundations for semantic networks. In D. G. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representations and understanding: Studies in cognitive science (pp. 35-84). New York: Academic Press.■ Woodworth, R. S. (1938). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt; London: Methuen (1939).■ Wundt, W. (1904). Principles of physiological psychology (Vol. 1). E. B. Titchener (Trans.). New York: Macmillan.■ Wundt, W. (1907). Lectures on human and animal psychology. J. E. Creighton & E. B. Titchener (Trans.). New York: Macmillan.■ Young, J. Z. (1978). Programs of the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.■ Ziman, J. (1978). Reliable knowledge: An exploration of the grounds for belief in science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Bibliography
-
2 Language
Philosophy is written in that great book, the universe, which is always open, right before our eyes. But one cannot understand this book without first learning to understand the language and to know the characters in which it is written. It is written in the language of mathematics, and the characters are triangles, circles, and other figures. Without these, one cannot understand a single word of it, and just wanders in a dark labyrinth. (Galileo, 1990, p. 232)It never happens that it [a nonhuman animal] arranges its speech in various ways in order to reply appropriately to everything that may be said in its presence, as even the lowest type of man can do. (Descartes, 1970a, p. 116)It is a very remarkable fact that there are none so depraved and stupid, without even excepting idiots, that they cannot arrange different words together, forming of them a statement by which they make known their thoughts; while, on the other hand, there is no other animal, however perfect and fortunately circumstanced it may be, which can do the same. (Descartes, 1967, p. 116)Human beings do not live in the object world alone, nor alone in the world of social activity as ordinarily understood, but are very much at the mercy of the particular language which has become the medium of expression for their society. It is quite an illusion to imagine that one adjusts to reality essentially without the use of language and that language is merely an incidental means of solving specific problems of communication or reflection. The fact of the matter is that the "real world" is to a large extent unconsciously built on the language habits of the group.... We see and hear and otherwise experience very largely as we do because the language habits of our community predispose certain choices of interpretation. (Sapir, 1921, p. 75)It powerfully conditions all our thinking about social problems and processes.... No two languages are ever sufficiently similar to be considered as representing the same social reality. The worlds in which different societies live are distinct worlds, not merely the same worlds with different labels attached. (Sapir, 1985, p. 162)[A list of language games, not meant to be exhaustive:]Giving orders, and obeying them- Describing the appearance of an object, or giving its measurements- Constructing an object from a description (a drawing)Reporting an eventSpeculating about an eventForming and testing a hypothesisPresenting the results of an experiment in tables and diagramsMaking up a story; and reading itPlay actingSinging catchesGuessing riddlesMaking a joke; and telling itSolving a problem in practical arithmeticTranslating from one language into anotherLANGUAGE Asking, thanking, cursing, greeting, and praying-. (Wittgenstein, 1953, Pt. I, No. 23, pp. 11 e-12 e)We dissect nature along lines laid down by our native languages.... The world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds-and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds.... No individual is free to describe nature with absolute impartiality but is constrained to certain modes of interpretation even while he thinks himself most free. (Whorf, 1956, pp. 153, 213-214)We dissect nature along the lines laid down by our native languages.The categories and types that we isolate from the world of phenomena we do not find there because they stare every observer in the face; on the contrary, the world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds-and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds.... We are thus introduced to a new principle of relativity, which holds that all observers are not led by the same physical evidence to the same picture of the universe, unless their linguistic backgrounds are similar or can in some way be calibrated. (Whorf, 1956, pp. 213-214)9) The Forms of a Person's Thoughts Are Controlled by Unperceived Patterns of His Own LanguageThe forms of a person's thoughts are controlled by inexorable laws of pattern of which he is unconscious. These patterns are the unperceived intricate systematizations of his own language-shown readily enough by a candid comparison and contrast with other languages, especially those of a different linguistic family. (Whorf, 1956, p. 252)It has come to be commonly held that many utterances which look like statements are either not intended at all, or only intended in part, to record or impart straightforward information about the facts.... Many traditional philosophical perplexities have arisen through a mistake-the mistake of taking as straightforward statements of fact utterances which are either (in interesting non-grammatical ways) nonsensical or else intended as something quite different. (Austin, 1962, pp. 2-3)In general, one might define a complex of semantic components connected by logical constants as a concept. The dictionary of a language is then a system of concepts in which a phonological form and certain syntactic and morphological characteristics are assigned to each concept. This system of concepts is structured by several types of relations. It is supplemented, furthermore, by redundancy or implicational rules..., representing general properties of the whole system of concepts.... At least a relevant part of these general rules is not bound to particular languages, but represents presumably universal structures of natural languages. They are not learned, but are rather a part of the human ability to acquire an arbitrary natural language. (Bierwisch, 1970, pp. 171-172)In studying the evolution of mind, we cannot guess to what extent there are physically possible alternatives to, say, transformational generative grammar, for an organism meeting certain other physical conditions characteristic of humans. Conceivably, there are none-or very few-in which case talk about evolution of the language capacity is beside the point. (Chomsky, 1972, p. 98)[It is] truth value rather than syntactic well-formedness that chiefly governs explicit verbal reinforcement by parents-which renders mildly paradoxical the fact that the usual product of such a training schedule is an adult whose speech is highly grammatical but not notably truthful. (R. O. Brown, 1973, p. 330)he conceptual base is responsible for formally representing the concepts underlying an utterance.... A given word in a language may or may not have one or more concepts underlying it.... On the sentential level, the utterances of a given language are encoded within a syntactic structure of that language. The basic construction of the sentential level is the sentence.The next highest level... is the conceptual level. We call the basic construction of this level the conceptualization. A conceptualization consists of concepts and certain relations among those concepts. We can consider that both levels exist at the same point in time and that for any unit on one level, some corresponding realizate exists on the other level. This realizate may be null or extremely complex.... Conceptualizations may relate to other conceptualizations by nesting or other specified relationships. (Schank, 1973, pp. 191-192)The mathematics of multi-dimensional interactive spaces and lattices, the projection of "computer behavior" on to possible models of cerebral functions, the theoretical and mechanical investigation of artificial intelligence, are producing a stream of sophisticated, often suggestive ideas.But it is, I believe, fair to say that nothing put forward until now in either theoretic design or mechanical mimicry comes even remotely in reach of the most rudimentary linguistic realities. (Steiner, 1975, p. 284)The step from the simple tool to the master tool, a tool to make tools (what we would now call a machine tool), seems to me indeed to parallel the final step to human language, which I call reconstitution. It expresses in a practical and social context the same understanding of hierarchy, and shows the same analysis by function as a basis for synthesis. (Bronowski, 1977, pp. 127-128)t is the language donn eґ in which we conduct our lives.... We have no other. And the danger is that formal linguistic models, in their loosely argued analogy with the axiomatic structure of the mathematical sciences, may block perception.... It is quite conceivable that, in language, continuous induction from simple, elemental units to more complex, realistic forms is not justified. The extent and formal "undecidability" of context-and every linguistic particle above the level of the phoneme is context-bound-may make it impossible, except in the most abstract, meta-linguistic sense, to pass from "pro-verbs," "kernals," or "deep deep structures" to actual speech. (Steiner, 1975, pp. 111-113)A higher-level formal language is an abstract machine. (Weizenbaum, 1976, p. 113)Jakobson sees metaphor and metonymy as the characteristic modes of binarily opposed polarities which between them underpin the two-fold process of selection and combination by which linguistic signs are formed.... Thus messages are constructed, as Saussure said, by a combination of a "horizontal" movement, which combines words together, and a "vertical" movement, which selects the particular words from the available inventory or "inner storehouse" of the language. The combinative (or syntagmatic) process manifests itself in contiguity (one word being placed next to another) and its mode is metonymic. The selective (or associative) process manifests itself in similarity (one word or concept being "like" another) and its mode is metaphoric. The "opposition" of metaphor and metonymy therefore may be said to represent in effect the essence of the total opposition between the synchronic mode of language (its immediate, coexistent, "vertical" relationships) and its diachronic mode (its sequential, successive, lineal progressive relationships). (Hawkes, 1977, pp. 77-78)It is striking that the layered structure that man has given to language constantly reappears in his analyses of nature. (Bronowski, 1977, p. 121)First, [an ideal intertheoretic reduction] provides us with a set of rules"correspondence rules" or "bridge laws," as the standard vernacular has it-which effect a mapping of the terms of the old theory (T o) onto a subset of the expressions of the new or reducing theory (T n). These rules guide the application of those selected expressions of T n in the following way: we are free to make singular applications of their correspondencerule doppelgangers in T o....Second, and equally important, a successful reduction ideally has the outcome that, under the term mapping effected by the correspondence rules, the central principles of T o (those of semantic and systematic importance) are mapped onto general sentences of T n that are theorems of Tn. (P. Churchland, 1979, p. 81)If non-linguistic factors must be included in grammar: beliefs, attitudes, etc. [this would] amount to a rejection of the initial idealization of language as an object of study. A priori such a move cannot be ruled out, but it must be empirically motivated. If it proves to be correct, I would conclude that language is a chaos that is not worth studying.... Note that the question is not whether beliefs or attitudes, and so on, play a role in linguistic behavior and linguistic judgments... [but rather] whether distinct cognitive structures can be identified, which interact in the real use of language and linguistic judgments, the grammatical system being one of these. (Chomsky, 1979, pp. 140, 152-153)23) Language Is Inevitably Influenced by Specific Contexts of Human InteractionLanguage cannot be studied in isolation from the investigation of "rationality." It cannot afford to neglect our everyday assumptions concerning the total behavior of a reasonable person.... An integrational linguistics must recognize that human beings inhabit a communicational space which is not neatly compartmentalized into language and nonlanguage.... It renounces in advance the possibility of setting up systems of forms and meanings which will "account for" a central core of linguistic behavior irrespective of the situation and communicational purposes involved. (Harris, 1981, p. 165)By innate [linguistic knowledge], Chomsky simply means "genetically programmed." He does not literally think that children are born with language in their heads ready to be spoken. He merely claims that a "blueprint is there, which is brought into use when the child reaches a certain point in her general development. With the help of this blueprint, she analyzes the language she hears around her more readily than she would if she were totally unprepared for the strange gabbling sounds which emerge from human mouths. (Aitchison, 1987, p. 31)Looking at ourselves from the computer viewpoint, we cannot avoid seeing that natural language is our most important "programming language." This means that a vast portion of our knowledge and activity is, for us, best communicated and understood in our natural language.... One could say that natural language was our first great original artifact and, since, as we increasingly realize, languages are machines, so natural language, with our brains to run it, was our primal invention of the universal computer. One could say this except for the sneaking suspicion that language isn't something we invented but something we became, not something we constructed but something in which we created, and recreated, ourselves. (Leiber, 1991, p. 8)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Language
-
3 molestar
v.1 to bother.perdone que le moleste… I'm sorry to bother you…¿le molesta que fume? do you mind if I smoke?Sus palabras acedaron a María His words Maryoyed Mary.2 to upset.me molestó que no me saludaras I was rather upset that you didn't say hello to me3 to be bothered by.Me molesta ese ruido I am bothered by that noise.4 to ail.* * *1 (interrumpir) to disturb■ no lo molestes, que está durmiendo don't disturb him, he's asleep2 (perturbar) to bother, annoy, upset3 (importunar) to pester■ ¡deja de molestarme ya! stop pestering me!4 (hacer daño - apretar) to hurt, be too tight; (- picar) to irritate5 (ofender) to upset1 (tomarse la molestia) to bother■ no se moleste en venir, ya se lo mandaremos a casa don't bother coming, we'll send it round to you2 (ofenderse) to take offence* * *verb1) to annoy, bother2) disturb3) trouble•* * *1. VT1) (=importunar) to bother, annoy¿no la estarán molestando, verdad? — they're not bothering o annoying you, are they?
no la molestes más con tus tonterías — stop pestering o bothering o annoying her with your silly games
2) (=interrumpir) to disturbsiento molestarte, pero necesito que me ayudes — I'm sorry to disturb o trouble o bother you, but I need your help
3) (=ofender) to upset2. VI1) (=importunar) to be a nuisancequita de en medio, que siempre estás molestando — get out of the way, you're always being a nuisance
no quisiera molestar, pero necesito hablar contigo — I don't want to bother you o be a nuisance, but I need to talk to you
me molesta mucho que me hablen así — it really annoys o irritates me when they talk to me like that
ese ruido me molesta — that noise is bothering o annoying o irritating me
me molesta el jarrón, ¿puedes apartarlo? — the vase is in the way, can you move it?
2) (=incomodar) to feel uncomfortable, bother¿te molesta el humo? — does the smoke bother you?
si le sigue molestando, acuda a su médico — if it goes on giving you trouble, see your doctor
3) (=ofender) to upset4) (=importar)[en preguntas]¿le molesta la radio? — does the radio bother you?, do you mind the radio being on?
¿te molestaría prestarme un paraguas? — would you mind lending me an umbrella?
¿le molesta que abra la ventana o si abro la ventana? — do you mind if I open the window?
3.See:* * *1.verbo transitivo1)a) ( importunar) to botherperdone que lo moleste — sorry to trouble o bother you
b) ( interrumpir) to disturb2) (ofender, disgustar) to upset2.molestar vi1) ( importunar) (+me/te/le etc)¿no te molesta ese ruido? — doesn't that noise bother you?
¿le molesta si fumo? — do you mind if I smoke?
me molesta su arrogancia — her arrogance irritates o annoys me
no me duele, pero me molesta — it doesn't hurt but it's uncomfortable
2) ( fastidiar) to be a nuisanceno quiero molestar — I don't want to be a nuisance o to cause any trouble
3.vino a ayudar pero no hizo más que molestar — he came to help, but he just made a nuisance of himself
molestarsev pron1) ( disgustarse) to get upsetse molestó por lo que le dije — he was upset o offended by what I said
2) ( tomarse el trabajo) to bother, trouble oneself (frml)no se moleste — it's all right o please, don't bother
¿para qué vas a molestarte? — why should you put yourself out?
molestarse EN + INF: ni se molestó en llamarme he didn't even bother to call me; se molestó en venir a verme — she took the trouble to come and see me
* * *= bother, irk, pester, disrupt, irritate, trouble, hassle, bug, tread on + toes, spite, annoy, nag (at), disturb, upset, niggle, importune, gall, peeve.Ex. Why bother, then, to create an alphabetical index to the classified file when you already have a printed alphabetical index to the schedules of the classification scheme?.Ex. She had been told from time to time that he seemed to derive satisfaction from needling the staff, but she had never been able to pin down specifically what he does that irks them.Ex. And there are those whom I have pestered from time to time over the past four years, and who have patiently answered my importunity.Ex. Essentially, problem patrons can be considered in three groups: (1) the dangerous or apparently dangerous; (2) the patron who disrupts readers; and (3) the nuisance whose focus is the librarian.Ex. Their education must accordingly be designed to prepare them for that future, however much this may irritate the myopics whose only concern is for the present.Ex. This is a problem that has frequently troubled teachers.Ex. Richins also included inconveniences such as special trips to complain, time and effort required to fill out form, being treated rudely, and having to hassle someone.Ex. I have a question that has been bugging me since I upgraded to ProCite 5 some time ago.Ex. For all the indisputable good the Dalai Lama does in terms of spiritual guidance, he seems reluctant to tread on any political toes.Ex. Men's abuse of children is in many instances instrumental in order to coerce or retaliate against women, echoing the Greek myth of Medea who killed her own children to spite her father.Ex. Library pests are any humans, large or microscopic beasts, library equipment or installations, or chemical and biological substances that hamper or annoy the reader.Ex. This a book that I had admired but that had nagged at me for years.Ex. Transcribe the data as found, however, if case endings are affected, if the grammatical construction of the data would be disturbed, or if one element is inseparably linked to another.Ex. Especially if the new subject is one which upsets the previous structure of relationships, it will be difficult to fit into the existing order.Ex. He was under the knife last week to treat the knee problem that has been niggling him.Ex. He was a shiftless, good-for-nothing man and his shrewish wife was constantly importuning him.Ex. It was the American attitude of superiority that galled them the most.Ex. Things like talking over the performances and cutting to commercials in the middle of performances were really peaving the people who watched.----* molestarse = stir + uneasily, get + Posesivo + knickers in a twist, get + Posesivo + panties in a bundle, begrudge, grudge, pique.* molestarse por = be bothered by, bridle at.* * *1.verbo transitivo1)a) ( importunar) to botherperdone que lo moleste — sorry to trouble o bother you
b) ( interrumpir) to disturb2) (ofender, disgustar) to upset2.molestar vi1) ( importunar) (+me/te/le etc)¿no te molesta ese ruido? — doesn't that noise bother you?
¿le molesta si fumo? — do you mind if I smoke?
me molesta su arrogancia — her arrogance irritates o annoys me
no me duele, pero me molesta — it doesn't hurt but it's uncomfortable
2) ( fastidiar) to be a nuisanceno quiero molestar — I don't want to be a nuisance o to cause any trouble
3.vino a ayudar pero no hizo más que molestar — he came to help, but he just made a nuisance of himself
molestarsev pron1) ( disgustarse) to get upsetse molestó por lo que le dije — he was upset o offended by what I said
2) ( tomarse el trabajo) to bother, trouble oneself (frml)no se moleste — it's all right o please, don't bother
¿para qué vas a molestarte? — why should you put yourself out?
molestarse EN + INF: ni se molestó en llamarme he didn't even bother to call me; se molestó en venir a verme — she took the trouble to come and see me
* * *= bother, irk, pester, disrupt, irritate, trouble, hassle, bug, tread on + toes, spite, annoy, nag (at), disturb, upset, niggle, importune, gall, peeve.Ex: Why bother, then, to create an alphabetical index to the classified file when you already have a printed alphabetical index to the schedules of the classification scheme?.
Ex: She had been told from time to time that he seemed to derive satisfaction from needling the staff, but she had never been able to pin down specifically what he does that irks them.Ex: And there are those whom I have pestered from time to time over the past four years, and who have patiently answered my importunity.Ex: Essentially, problem patrons can be considered in three groups: (1) the dangerous or apparently dangerous; (2) the patron who disrupts readers; and (3) the nuisance whose focus is the librarian.Ex: Their education must accordingly be designed to prepare them for that future, however much this may irritate the myopics whose only concern is for the present.Ex: This is a problem that has frequently troubled teachers.Ex: Richins also included inconveniences such as special trips to complain, time and effort required to fill out form, being treated rudely, and having to hassle someone.Ex: I have a question that has been bugging me since I upgraded to ProCite 5 some time ago.Ex: For all the indisputable good the Dalai Lama does in terms of spiritual guidance, he seems reluctant to tread on any political toes.Ex: Men's abuse of children is in many instances instrumental in order to coerce or retaliate against women, echoing the Greek myth of Medea who killed her own children to spite her father.Ex: Library pests are any humans, large or microscopic beasts, library equipment or installations, or chemical and biological substances that hamper or annoy the reader.Ex: This a book that I had admired but that had nagged at me for years.Ex: Transcribe the data as found, however, if case endings are affected, if the grammatical construction of the data would be disturbed, or if one element is inseparably linked to another.Ex: Especially if the new subject is one which upsets the previous structure of relationships, it will be difficult to fit into the existing order.Ex: He was under the knife last week to treat the knee problem that has been niggling him.Ex: He was a shiftless, good-for-nothing man and his shrewish wife was constantly importuning him.Ex: It was the American attitude of superiority that galled them the most.Ex: Things like talking over the performances and cutting to commercials in the middle of performances were really peaving the people who watched.* molestarse = stir + uneasily, get + Posesivo + knickers in a twist, get + Posesivo + panties in a bundle, begrudge, grudge, pique.* molestarse por = be bothered by, bridle at.* * *molestar [A1 ]vtA1 (importunar) to botherperdone que lo moleste, pero quisiera pedirle algo sorry to trouble o bother you, but I'd like to ask you something¿este señor la está molestando, señorita? is this man bothering you, Miss?2 (interrumpir) to disturbno la molestes, está estudiando don't disturb her, she's studyingque no me moleste nadie, voy a dormir un rato don't let anybody disturb me, I'm going to take a napB (ofender, disgustar) to upsetperdona si te he molestado I'm sorry if I've upset you■ molestarviA(importunar): ¿no te molesta ese ruido? doesn't that noise bother you?[ S ] se ruega no molestar please do not disturb¿le molesta si fumo? do you mind if I smoke?me molesta su arrogancia her arrogance irritates o annoys meya sabes que me molesta que hables de él you know I don't like you to talk about him, you know I get upset o it upsets me when you talk about himnunca uso pulseras, me molestan para trabajar I never wear bracelets, they get in the way when I'm workingno me duele, pero me molesta it doesn't hurt but it's uncomfortable o it bothers mesi le molesta mucho, puedo ponerle una inyección if it's very sore o painful, I could give you an injectionB (fastidiar) to be a nuisancesi vas a molestar, te vas de clase if you're going to be a nuisance, you can leave the classroomvino a ayudar pero no hizo más que molestar he came to help, but he just got in the way o made a nuisance of himselfson unos niños encantadores, nunca molestan they're lovely children, they're never any trouble o they're no trouble at allno quiero molestar I don't want to be a nuisance o to get in the way o to cause any troubleA (disgustarse) to get upsetno debes molestarte, lo hizo sin querer don't get upset, he didn't mean to do itmolestarse POR algo:se molestó por algo he got upset about somethingespero que no se haya molestado por lo que le dije I hope you weren't upset o offended by what I saidmolestarse CON algn to get annoyed WITH sb, get cross WITH sb ( BrE)se molestó conmigo porque no lo invité he got annoyed o cross with me because I didn't invite him, he was put out o upset because I didn't invite himB (tomarse el trabajo) to bother, trouble oneself ( frml)no se moleste, me voy enseguida it's all right o please, don't bother o don't worry, I'm just leavingno se molesta por nadie, sólo piensa en él he doesn't bother o worry about anybody else, all he thinks about is himself¿para qué vas a molestarte? why should you put yourself out?molestarse EN + INF:ni se molestó en llamarme he didn't even bother to call mese molestó en venir hasta aquí a avisarnos she took the trouble to come o she went to the trouble of coming all this way to tell usyo no me voy a molestar en cocinar para ellos I'm not going to put myself out cooking for them* * *
molestar ( conjugate molestar) verbo transitivo
1
◊ perdone que lo moleste sorry to trouble o bother you
2 (ofender, disgustar) to upset
verbo intransitivo
1 ( importunar):◊ ¿le molesta si fumo? do you mind if I smoke?;
me molesta su arrogancia her arrogance irritates o annoys me;
no me duele, pero me molesta it doesn't hurt but it's uncomfortable
2 ( fastidiar) to be a nuisance;◊ no quiero molestar I don't want to be a nuisance o to cause any trouble
molestarse verbo pronominal
1 ( disgustarse) to get upset;
molestarse POR algo to get upset about sth;
molestarse CON algn to get annoyed with sb
2 ( tomarse el trabajo) to bother, trouble oneself (frml);
se molestó en venir hasta aquí a avisarnos she took the trouble to come all this way to tell us
molestar verbo transitivo
1 (causar enojo, incomodidad) to disturb, bother: ¿le molestaría contestar a unas preguntas?, would you mind answering some questions?
me molesta que grites, it annoys me when you shout
2 (causar dolor, incomodidad) to hurt
' molestar' also found in these entries:
Spanish:
dañar
- dejar
- hartar
- jambar
- jorobar
- marear
- picar
- reventar
- ruido
- sino
- vivir
- chingar
- chocar
- chorear
- embromar
- enredar
- fastidiar
- fregar
- huevear
- importar
- joder
- nomás
- solo
English:
aggravate
- annoy
- bother
- bug
- disturb
- gall
- inconvenience
- intrude
- irk
- irritate
- nettle
- pester
- put out
- roil
- trouble
- worry
- heckler
- impose
- put
- spite
* * *♦ vt1. [perturbar] to bother;el calor no me molesta the heat doesn't bother me;esa luz tan brillante me molesta that bright light is hurting my eyes;deja ya de molestar al gato leave the cat alone;¡deja de molestarme! stop annoying me!;¿te están molestando los niños? are the children bothering you?;las moscas no paraban de molestarnos the flies were a real nuisance;¿te molesta la radio? is the radio bothering you?;¿te molesta si abro la ventana? do you mind if I open the window?;perdone que le moleste… I'm sorry to bother you…me molesta un poco la herida my wound is rather uncomfortable o a bit sore;vuelva dentro de un mes si le sigue molestando come back in a month's time if it's still troubling you3. [ofender] to upset;me molestó que no me saludaras I was rather upset that you didn't say hello to me;… todo esto dicho sin ánimo de molestar a nadie I don't want to cause anyone offence but…♦ vivámonos, aquí no hacemos más que molestar let's go, we're in the way here;deja ya de molestar con tantas preguntas stop being such a nuisance and asking all those questions;¿molesto? – no, no, pasa am I interrupting? – no, not at all, come in;no querría molestar, pero necesito hablar contigo un momento I don't want to interrupt, but I need to have a word with you;puedes aparcar el camión allí, que no molesta you can park the truck over there where it won't be in the way;no molestar [en letrero] do not disturb* * *v/t1 bother, annoy2 ( doler) trouble;no molestar do not disturb* * *molestar vt1) fastidiar: to annoy, to bother2) : to disturb, to disruptmolestar vi: to be a nuisance* * *molestar vb1. (interrumpir) to disturbno lo molestes, está descansando don't disturb him he's resting2. (importunar) to bother5. (importar) to mind¿le molesta que fume? do you mind if I smoke? -
4 regular
['reɡjulə] 1. adjective1) (usual: Saturday is his regular day for shopping; That isn't our regular postman, is it?) sædvanlig2) ((American) normal: He's too handicapped to attend a regular school.) almindelig; normal3) (occurring, acting etc with equal amounts of space, time etc between: They placed guards at regular intervals round the camp; Is his pulse regular?) regelmæssig4) (involving doing the same things at the same time each day etc: a man of regular habits.) fast5) (frequent: He's a regular visitor; He's one of our regular customers.) jævnlig; fast6) (permanent; lasting: He's looking for a regular job.) fast7) ((of a noun, verb etc) following one of the usual grammatical patterns of the language: `Walk' is a regular verb, but `go' is an irregular verb.) regelmæssig8) (the same on both or all sides or parts; neat; symmetrical: a girl with regular features; A square is a regular figure.) regulær9) (of ordinary size: I don't want the large size of packet - just give me the regular one.) medium; mellemstor10) ((of a soldier) employed full-time, professional; (of an army) composed of regular soldiers.) professionel2. noun1) (a soldier in the regular army.) professionel soldat2) (a regular customer (eg at a bar).) stamgæst•- regularly
- regulate
- regulation
- regulator* * *['reɡjulə] 1. adjective1) (usual: Saturday is his regular day for shopping; That isn't our regular postman, is it?) sædvanlig2) ((American) normal: He's too handicapped to attend a regular school.) almindelig; normal3) (occurring, acting etc with equal amounts of space, time etc between: They placed guards at regular intervals round the camp; Is his pulse regular?) regelmæssig4) (involving doing the same things at the same time each day etc: a man of regular habits.) fast5) (frequent: He's a regular visitor; He's one of our regular customers.) jævnlig; fast6) (permanent; lasting: He's looking for a regular job.) fast7) ((of a noun, verb etc) following one of the usual grammatical patterns of the language: `Walk' is a regular verb, but `go' is an irregular verb.) regelmæssig8) (the same on both or all sides or parts; neat; symmetrical: a girl with regular features; A square is a regular figure.) regulær9) (of ordinary size: I don't want the large size of packet - just give me the regular one.) medium; mellemstor10) ((of a soldier) employed full-time, professional; (of an army) composed of regular soldiers.) professionel2. noun1) (a soldier in the regular army.) professionel soldat2) (a regular customer (eg at a bar).) stamgæst•- regularly
- regulate
- regulation
- regulator -
5 čelověkъ
čelověkъ Grammatical information: m. o Proto-Slavic meaning: `man'Page in Trubačev: IV 48-50Old Church Slavic:člověkъ `man' [m o]Russian:čelovék `man' [m o], čelovéka [Gens]Ukrainian:čolovík `man' [m o]Czech:člověk `man' [m o]Slovak:Polish:Serbo-Croatian:čòvjek `man' [m o], čòvjeka [Gens];čȍvjek `man' [m o], čovjèka [Gens];Čak. čovȉk (Vrgada) `man' [m o], čovȉka [Gens];Čak. čovȉk (Novi) `man' [m o];Čak. čovȉk \{1\} (Orbanići) `man' [m o], čovȉka [Gens]Slovene:člóvẹk `man' [m o], človẹ́ka [Gens]Bulgarian:čelovék `man' [m o];čovék `man' [m o]Lithuanian:kẽlias `family, tribe, generation' [m jo] 4;vaĩkas `child' [m o]Notes:\{1\} Less frequently čovȅk or šovȅk. -
6 mǫ̑žь
mǫ̑žь Grammatical information: m. jo Accent paradigm: c Proto-Slavic meaning: `man, husband'Page in Trubačev: XX 158-161Old Church Slavic:mǫžь `man, husband' [m jo]Russian:Czech:Slovak:Polish:mąż `man, husband' [m jo], męża [Gens]Serbo-Croatian:mȗž `husband, (obs.) man' [m jo], mȗža [Gens];Čak. mȗž (Vrgada) `husband' [m jo], mȗža [Gens];Čak. mȗž (Novi) `husband' [m jo];Čak. muȏš (Orbanići) `husband' [m jo], muȏža [Gens]Slovene:mǫ̑ž `man, husband' [m jo], možȃ [Gens]Bulgarian:măž `man, husband' [m jo]Indo-European reconstruction: mon-g-io-??Other cognates:Skt. mánu- (RV+) `man, mankind' [m o]; -
7 ἐλεύθερος
Grammatical information: adj.Dialectal forms: Myc. ereutero \/ eleutheros\/.Compounds: rarely as 1. member, e. g. ἐλευθερό-στομος `with free mouth' (A.); as 2. member a. o. in ἀπ-ελεύθερος `freedman' (Att.), mostly taken as postverbal to ἀπ-ελευθερόω `make free, make freedman' (Pl., Arist.), Schwyzer 421, Strömberg Greek Prefix Studies 39f. m. Lit.Derivatives: ἐλευθερία `freedom' (Pi.) with ἐλευθεριωτικός `proclaiming freedom' (Him.); denomin. verbs: ἐλευθερόω `make free' (Ion.-Att.) with ἐλευθέρ-ωσις, - ωμα, - ωτής; ἐλευθερεσθείς (Thess., Schwyzer 736 w. lit.); ἐλευθέριος `as a free man' (Ion.-Att.), also as surname of Zeus (Pi., Hdt., because of the victory on the Persians) with Έλευθεριών month name (Halikarnassos); ἐλευθεριότης `frankness, liberality' (Pl.) and the denomin. ἐλευθεριάζω `speak and act as a free man' (Pl.); ἐλευθερικός `belonging to a free man' (Pl. Lg. 701e beside δεσποτικός; 919e beside the bahuvrihi ἀν-ελεύθερος; cf. Chantraine Études sur le vocab. gr. 146). Cret. ἐλούθερος with sec. voalism (Schwyzer 194)..Etymology: Old adjective, also in: Lat. līber, - era, also as gods name = Venet. Louzera, Pelign. loufir, Osc. (Iúveis) Lúvfreis = ( Iovis) Līberī; cf. Falisc. lōferta = līberta, OLat. loebertāt-em = Falisk. loifirtat-o; uncertain Toch. A lyutāri `the upper (men), overseer?' (Duchesne-Guillemin BSL 41, 181). - One starts from an old word for `people', which is found elsewhere, in Germanic and Balto-Slavic: OHG liut `people', pl. liuti `people', OE lēod `people', Lith. liáudis `lower people', Csl., Russ. ljudъ `people', OCS ljúdьje, Russ. ljúdi pl. `men, people'; IE * h₁leudh-o-, -i-; from there also Burgund. leudis `a free man', OCS ORuss. ljudinъ `free man'; ἐλεύθερος, līber (\< IE * h₁leudh-ero-s), so prop. `belonging to the people', as opposed to the subjected peoples. - Against Altheims idea (s. W.-Hofmann s. 3. Līber), the Ital. Līber came through Oscan from the Greeks (: Ζεὺς Έλευθέριος, Διόνυσος Έλευθερεύς; s. above), see v. Wilamowitz Glaube 2, 334 n. 2, also Pisani Ist. Lomb. 89 (1956) 17f., who points to Venet. Louzera, which shows that the god was original in Italy (see Krahe Das Venetische 24). - Rich litt. in W.-Hofmann s. 2. līber, 3. Līber and līberī, Fraenkel Lit. et. Wb. s. liáudis, Vasmer Russ. et. Wb. s. ljúd. - See also ἐλεύσομαι. The laryngeal is seen in Skt. vī-rudh- `plant', anū-rudh- (Mayrh. EWAia 2, 467ff.) - Of forein origin but perh. reshaped after ἐλεύθερος and with oppositive accent the PlaceN Έλευθεραί, from which Έλευθερεύς as surname of Dionysos; cf. on Εἰλείθυια and Έλευίς. - On the meaning Benveniste, Institutions 1. 321ff.Page in Frisk: 1,491Greek-English etymological dictionary (Ελληνικά-Αγγλικά ετυμολογική λεξικό) > ἐλεύθερος
-
8 μάγγανον
Grammatical information: n.Meaning: `philtre, charm, block of a pulley' (Hero Bel., Pap. IIIp), [`eiserner Pflock, Bolzen'] (Sch.), `throwing machine, ballista, tormentum' (Gloss., H.), `means to deceive, bewitch' (Heracl. All., H.).Derivatives: μαγγανάριος `deceiver' (pap. IIIp), `mechanic' (Papp.), will be a loan from Latin. Denomin. verb μαγγανεύω `deceive, bewitch with artificial means, play tricks' with μαγγαν-εία `trickery' (Pl. Lg., Ph.), - εύματα pl. `charms, philtres' (Pl., Plu.), - ευτής `impostor, quack' (Suid., Phot.), - ευτικη τέχνη `agical art' (Poll.), - εύτριαι pl. H. s. βαμβακεύ-τριαι, - ευτήριον `haunt for impostors' (Them.).Origin: PG [a word of Pre-Greek origin]Etymology: The word got as a loan a wide spread: Lat. manganum `machine' (to Rom., e.g. Ital. mangano `sling') with the unclear byform mangō `a handler, who promotes his ware by artificial means' (from hell. *μάγγων?), from where mangōnium `dressing up ware', Alb. mangë `hemp-brake', mengji `medicine', MHG MLG mange `throwing-machine', NHG Mange(l) `smoothing roll(?) for laundry' (from where Balt., e.g. Lith. mañgalis `mangling-machine'). If we forget these loans, a few words from the farthest east and west remain, which have been connected as cognate with μάγγανον: Skt. mañju-, mañjula- `beautiful, sweet, charming', maṅgala n. `happiness, salvation, good omen' (all ep. class.), Osset. mäng `deceit'; Celt., MIr. meng `deceit, cleverness, ruse' (but Toch. A maṅk `guilt, fault, sin', adduced by Schneider, together with B meṅki `id.', also `smaller', with μανός, μάνυ). To this rather motley collection one may add further the group of μάσσω `knead', through which the most wide combinations can be made. - Lit. in Bq, WP. 2, 233, Pok. 731, W.-Hofmann s. mangō; esp. Meringer IF 19, 436f. a. 21, 282, whose attempts to make the history of these words concrete, are in principle no doubt correct, even when they lack confirmation or are in detail even wrong. - From an IE root * meng- (Pok. 731) the Greek form cannot be derived; the word must then be Pre-Greek (as was already stated by W.- Hofmann s.v. mango), where mang-an- is unproblematic. The Sanskrit words are semantically too far off (perh. they are of Dravidian origin, Mayrhofer KEWA547, 553 and EWAia 379f.). (Such isolated Sanskrit comparisons with Greek must often be discarded.) The other words will be loans from Latin. (Lith. mañgalis is a loan from German.) The original meaning was no doubt as Frisk assumed a technical instrument. The meaning `hemp-brake' goes in the same direction, but the meaning ballista I cannot easily combine. The meaning `mangling-machine' recurs several times (Germ. `Glättroll für Wäsche'). It served to `embellish' the cloths. From there the notion of deceit. It is a good example of the long life of a Pre-Greek word which was by some considered as IE.Page in Frisk: 2,155Greek-English etymological dictionary (Ελληνικά-Αγγλικά ετυμολογική λεξικό) > μάγγανον
-
9 ars
ars, artis, f. [v. arma], skill in joining something, combining, working it, etc., with the advancement of Roman culture, carried entirely beyond the sphere of the common pursuits of life, into that of artistic and scientific action, just as, on the other hand, in mental cultivation, skill is applied to morals, designating character, manner of thinking, so far as it is made known by external actions (syn.: doctrina, sollertia, calliditas, prudentia, virtus, industria, ratio, via, dolus).I. A.Lit.:B.Zeno censet artis proprium esse creare et gignere,
Cic. N. D. 2, 22, 57:quarum (artium) omne opus est in faciendo atque agendo,
id. Ac. 2, 7, 22; id. Off. 2, 3, 12 sq.—Transf.1.With the idea extended, any physical or mental activity, so far as it is practically exhibited; a profession, art ( music, poetry, medicine, etc.); acc. to Roman notions, the arts were either liberales or ingenuae artes, arts of freemen, the liberal arts; or artes illiberales or sordidae, the arts, employments, of slaves or the lower classes.a.In gen.:b.Eleus Hippias gloriatus est nihil esse ullā in arte rerum omnium, quod ipse nesciret: nec solum has artes, quibus liberales doctrinae atque ingenuae continerentur, geometriam, musicam, litterarum cognitionem et poëtarum, atque illa, quae de naturis rerum, quae de hominum moribus, quae de rebus publicis dicerentur, sed anulum, quem haberet, pallium, quo amictus, soccos, quibus indutus esset, se suā manu confecisse,
Cic. de Or. 3, 32, 127:Jam de artificiis et quaestibus, qui liberales habendi, qui sordidi sint, haec fere accepimus. Primum improbantur ii quaestus, qui in odia hominum incurrunt, ut portitorum, ut feneratorum. Illiberales autem et sordidi quaestus mercenariorum omniumque, quorum operae, non artes emuntur: est enim in illis ipsa merces auctoramentum servitutis... Opificesque omnes in sordidā arte versantur... Quibus autem artibus aut prudentia major inest aut non mediocris utilitas quaeritur, ut medicina, ut architectura, ut doctrina rerum honestarum, hae sunt iis, quorum ordini conveniunt, honestae,
Cic. Off. 1, 42, 150 sq.; cf. id. Fam. 4, 3:artes elegantes,
id. Fin. 3, 2, 4:laudatae,
id. de Or. 1, 3, 9:bonae,
Ov. Tr. 3, 7, 32:optimae,
Cic. Fin. 2, 34, 111:magnae,
id. Or. 1, 4:maximae,
id. de Or. 1, 2, 6:gravissimae,
id. Fin. 2, 34, 112:leviores artes,
id. Brut. 1, 3:mediocres,
id. de Or. 1, 2, 6:omnis artifex omnis artis,
Vulg. Apoc. 18, 22:artifices omnium artium,
ib. 1 Par. 22, 15.—Esp., of a single art, and,(α).With an adj. designating it:(β).ars gymnastica,
gymnastics, Plaut. Most. 1, 2, 73:ars duellica,
the art of war, id. Ep. 3, 4, 14:ars imperatoria,
generalship, Quint. 2, 17, 34:(artes) militares et imperatoriae,
Liv. 25, 9, 12:artes civiles,
politics, Tac. Agr. 29:artes urbanae,
i. e. jurisprudence and eloquence, Liv. 9, 42:ars grammatica,
grammar, Plin. 7, 39, 40, § 128:rhetorica,
Quint. 2, 17, 4:musica,
poetry, Ter. Hec. prol. 23:musica,
music, Plin. 2, 25, 23, § 93:medicae artes,
the healing art, medicine, Ov. H. 5, 145; so,ars Apollinea,
id. Tr. 3, 3, 10:magica,
Verg. A. 4, 493, and Vulg. Sap. 17, 7; so,maleficis artibus inserviebat,
he used witchcraft, ib. 2 Par. 33, 6 al.—With a gen. designating it:2.ars disserendi,
dialectics, Cic. de Or. 2, 38, 157:ars dicendi,
the art of speaking, id. ib. 1, 23, 107, and Quint. 2, 17, 17; so,ars eloquentiae,
id. 2, 11, 4:ars medendi,
Ov. A. A. 2, 735:ars medentium,
Stat. S. 5, 1, 158:medicorum ars,
Vulg. 1 Par. 16, 12:pigmentariorum ars,
the art of unguents, ib. 2 Par. 16, 4:ars armorum,
the art of war, Quint. 2, 17, 33:ars pugnae,
Vulg. Judith, 5, 27; so in plur.:belli artes,
Liv. 25, 40, 5:ars gubernandi,
navigation, Cic. Div. 1, 14, 24; Quint. 2, 17, 33; so,ars gubernatoris,
Cic. Fin. 1, 13, 42.—Sometimes the kind of art may be distinguished by the connection, so that ars is used absol. of a particular art:instruere Atriden num potes arte meā? i. e. arte sagittandi,
Ov. H. 16, 364:tunc ego sim Inachio notior arte Lino, i. e. arte canendi,
Prop. 3, 4, 8:fert ingens a puppe Notus: nunc arte (sc. navigandi) relictā Ingemit,
Stat. Th. 3, 29; so Luc. 7, 126; Sil. 4, 715:imus ad insignes Urbis ab arte (sc. rhetoricā) viros,
Ov. Tr. 4, 10, 16:ejusdem erat artis, i. e. artis scaenofactoriae,
Vulg. Act. 18, 3.—Science, knowledge:C. 1.quis ignorat, ii, qui mathematici vocantur, quantā in obscuritate rerum et quam reconditā in arte et multiplici subtilique versentur,
Cic. de Or. 1, 3, 10:nam si ars ita definitur, ex rebus penitus perspectis planeque cognitis atque ab opinionis arbitrio sejunctis, scientiāque comprehensis, non mihi videtur ars oratoris esse ulla,
id. ib. 1, 23, 108: nihil est quod ad artem redigi possit, nisi ille prius, qui illa tenet. quorum artem instituere vult, habeat illam scientiam (sc. dialecticam), ut ex iis rebus, quarum ars nondum sit, artem efficere possit, id. ib. 1, 41, 186:ars juris civilis,
id. ib. 1, 42, 190:(Antiochus) negabat ullam esse artem, quae ipsa a se proficisceretur. Etenim semper illud extra est, quod arte comprehenditur... Est enim perspicuum nullam artem ipsam in se versari, sed esse aliud artem ipsam, aliud, quod propositum sit arti,
id. Fin. 5, 6, 16; id. ad Q. Fr. 1, 1, 9; id. Cael. 30, 72; id. Or. 1, 4:vir bonus optimisque artibus eruditus,
Nep. Att. 12, 4: ingenium docile, come, ap-tum ad artes optimas, id. Dion, 1, 2 al.—The theory of any art or science: ars est praeceptio, quae dat certam viam rationemque faciendi aliquid, Auct. ad Her. 1, 1;a.Asper, p. 1725 P.: non omnia, quaecumque loquimur, mihi videntur ad artem et ad praecepta esse revocanda,
not every thing is to be traced back to theory and rules, Cic. de Or. 2, 11, 44: res mihi videtur esse facultate ( in practice) praeclara, arte ( in theory) mediocris;ars enim earum rerum est, quae sciuntur: oratoris autem omnis actio opinionibus, non scientiā continetur,
id. ib. 2, 7, 30; id. Ac. 2, 7, 22.—In later Lat. ars is used,Absol. for grammatical analysis, grammar:b.curru non, ut quidam putant, pro currui posuit, nec est apocope: sed ratio artis antiquae, etc.,
Serv. ad Verg. A. 1, 156; 1, 95: et hoc est artis, ut (vulgus) masculino utamur, quia omnia Latina nomina in us exeuntia, si neutra fuerint, tertiae sunt declinationis, etc., id. ad eund. ib. 1, 149: secundum artem dicamus honor, arbor, lepor: plerumque poëtae r in s mutant, id. ad eund. ib. 1, 153 al.—Hence also,As a title of books in which such theories are discussed, for rhetorical and, at a later period, for grammatical treatises.(α).Rhetorical:(β).quam multa non solum praecepta in artibus, sed etiam exempla in orationibus bene dicendi reliquerunt!
Cic. Fin. 4, 3, 5:ipsae rhetorum artes, quae sunt totae forenses atque populares,
id. ib. 3, 1, 4: neque eo dico, quod ejus (Hermagorae) ars mihi mendosissime scripta videatur; nam satis in eā videtur ex antiquis artibus ( from the ancient works on rhetoric) ingeniose et diligenter electas res collocāsse, id. Inv. 1, 6 fin.:illi verbis et artibus aluerunt naturae principia, hi autem institutis et legibus,
id. Rep. 3, 4, 7:artem scindens Theodori,
Juv. 7, 177.—Grammar:2.in artibus legimus superlativum gradum non nisi genitivo plurali jungi,
Serv. ad Verg. A. 1, 96: ut in artibus lectum est, id. ad eund. ib. 1, 535.—So Ars, as the title of the later Lat. grammars: Donati Ars Grammatica, Cledonii Ars, Marii Victorini Ars, etc.; v. the grammarians in Gothofred., Putsch., Lindem., Keil.—The knowledge, art, skill, workmanship, employed in effecting or working upon an object (Fr. adresse):3.majore quādam opus est vel arte vel diligentiā,
Cic. Ac. 2, 14 fin.:et tripodas septem pondere et arte pares,
Ov. H. 3, 32: qui canit arte, canat;qui bibit arte, bibat,
id. A. A. 2, 506:arte laboratae vestes,
Verg. A. 1, 639:plausus tunc arte carebat,
was void of art, was natural, unaffected, Ov. A. A. 1, 113.—(Concr.) The object artistically formed, a work of art:4.clipeum efferri jussit Didymaonis artis,
Verg. A. 5, 359:divite me scilicet artium, Quas aut Parrhasius protulit aut Scopas,
Hor. C. 4, 8, 5; id. Ep. 1, 6, 17.—Artes (personified), the Muses:II.artium chorus,
Phaedr. 3, prol. 19.—Transf. from mind to morals, the moral character of a man, so far as it is made known by actions, conduct, manner of acting, habit, practice, whether good or bad:si in te aegrotant artes antiquae tuae,
your former manner of life, conduct, Plaut. Trin. 1, 2, 35; cf. Hor. C. 4, 15, 12; Plaut. Trin. 2, 1, 6 Lind.:nempe tuā arte viginti minae Pro psaltriā periere,
Ter. Ad. 4, 7, 24:quid est, Quod tibi mea ars efficere hoc possit amplius?
my assiduity, id. And. 1, 1, 4:Hac arte (i. e. constantiā, perseverantiā) Pollux et vagus Hercules Enisus arces attigit igneas,
Hor. C. 3, 3, 9:multae sunt artes (i. e. virtutes) eximiae, hujus administrae comitesque virtutis (sc. imperatoris),
Cic. Imp. Pomp. 13; id. Fin. 2, 34, 115; id. Verr. 2, 4, 37 Zumpt:nam imperium facile his artibus retinetur, quibus initio partum est,
Sall. C. 2, 4 Kritz; so id. ib. 5, 7:cultusque artesque virorum,
Ov. M. 7, 58:mores quoque confer et artes,
id. R. Am. 713: praeclari facinoris aut artis [p. 167] bonae famam quaerere, Sall. C. 2, 9; so id. ib. 10, 4:animus insolens malarum artium,
id. ib. 3, 4; so Tac. A. 14, 57.—Hence also, absol. in mal. part. as in Gr. technê for cunning, artifice, fraud, stratagem:haec arte tractabat virum,
Ter. Heaut. 2, 3, 125 (cf. Ov. H. 17, 142):capti eādem arte sunt, quā ceperant Fabios,
Liv. 2, 51; 3, 35:at Cytherea novas artes, nova pectore versat Consilia,
Verg. A. 1, 657; so id. ib. 7, 477:ille dolis instructus et arte Pelasgā,
id. ib. 2, 152:talibus insidiis perjurique arte Sinonis Credita res, etc.,
id. ib. 2, 195:fraudes innectere ponto Antiquā parat arte,
Luc. 4, 449:tantum illi vel ingenii vel artis vel fortunae superfuit,
Suet. Tit. 1:fugam arte simulantes,
Vulg. Jud. 20, 32: regem summis artibus pellexit, pasêi mêchanêi, Suet. Vit. 2. -
10 forma
forma, ae, f. [Sanscr. dhar-, dhar-āmi, bear; dhar-i-man, figure; Gr. thra- in thrênus, thronos; cf. Lat. frētus, frēnum, fortis, etc.], form, in the most comprehensive sense of the word, contour, figure, shape, appearance (syn.: species, frons, facies, vultus; figura).I.Lit.A.In gen.: Ha. Earum nutrix, qua sit facie, mihi expedi. Mi. Statura haud magna, corpore aquilo. Ha. Ipsa ea'st. Mi. Specie venusta, ore parvo, atque oculis pernigris. Ha. Formam quidem hercle verbis depinxti mihi, Plaut. Poen. 5, 2, 154; cf.:B.quia semper eorum suppeditabatur facies et forma manebat,
Lucr. 5, 1175:corporis nostri partes totaque figura et forma et statura, quam apta ad naturam sit, apparet,
Cic. Fin. 5, 12, 35; cf. Auct. Her. 4, 47, 60:si omnium animantium formam vincit hominis figura, etc.,
Cic. N. D. 1, 18, 48:forma ac species liberalis,
id. Cael. 3, 6; cf. id. N. D. 1, 14, 37; 1, 27, 76 sqq.; id. Verr. 2, 4, 58, § 129; id. N. D. 1, 10, 26: aspicite, o cives, senis Enni imagini' formam, Enn. ap. Cic. Tusc. 1, 15, 34 (Epigr. 1 ed. Vahl.):hoc dico, non ab hominibus formae figuram venisse ad deos... Non ergo illorum humana forma, sed nostra divina dicenda est, etc.,
id. N. D. 1, 32, 90:formaï servare figuram,
Lucr. 4, 69; cf.:Homeri picturam, non poesin videmus. Quae regio, quae species formaque pugnae, qui motus hominum non ita expictus est, ut, etc.,
Cic. Tusc. 5, 39, 114 (v. Moser ad h. l.):eximia forma pueri,
id. ib. 5, 21, 61:virgines formā excellente,
Liv. 1, 9, 11:formā praestante puellae,
Ov. H. 3, 35:forma viros neglecta decet,
id. A. A. 1, 509; cf.:ut excellentem muliebris formae pulchritudinem muta in sese imago contineret,
Cic. Inv. 2, 1, 1:illa aetate venerabilis, haec formae pulchrituline,
Curt. 3, 11, 24:virginem adultam, formā excellentem,
Liv. 3, 44, 4:virginem maxime formā notam,
id. 4, 9, 4:una et viginti formae litterarum,
Cic. N. D. 2, 37, 93:solis,
Lucr. 5, 571:muralium falcium,
Caes. B. G. 3, 14, 5:lanceae novae formae,
Suet. Dom. 10:nova aedificiorum Urbis,
id. Ner. 16:porticus,
Plin. Ep. 9, 39, 5:forma et situs agri,
Hor. Ep. 1, 16, 4:eādem cerā aliae atque aliae formae duci solent,
Quint. 10, 5, 9:geometricae formae,
Cic. Rep. 1, 17; cf. id. de Or. 1, 42, 187:cum sit geometria divisa in numeros atque formas,
Quint. 1, 10, 35; cf.also: Archimedes intentus formis, quas in pulvere descripserat,
Liv. 25, 31, 9:dimidia circuli,
Plin. 2, 59, 60, § 150:clarissimorum virorum formae,
figures, images, Cic. Mil. 32, 86:ille artifex, cum faceret Jovis formam aut Minervae, etc.,
id. Or. 2, 9:igneae formae,
i. e. fiery bodies, id. N. D. 2, 40, 101:inque tori formam molles sternentur arenae,
in the shape, form, Ov. Am. 2, 11, 47:(sacellum) crudis laterculis ad formam camini,
Plin. 30, 7, 20, § 63:ut haec mulier praeter formam nihil ad similitudinem hominis reservarit,
Cic. Clu. 70, 199.—In poet. circumlocution with gen.: astra tenent caeleste solum formaeque deorum, the forms of gods, for gods, Ov. M. 1, 73:formae ferarum,
id. ib. 2, 78:ursi ac formae magnorum luporum,
Verg. A. 7, 18:formae ingentis leo,
of great size, Just. 15, 4, 17; Tac. A. 4, 72.—In partic.1.Pregn., a fine form, beauty:2.di tibi formam, di tibi divitias dederant,
Hor. Ep. 1, 4, 6; cf.:et genus et formam regina pecunia donat,
id. ib. 1, 6, 37:movit Ajacem forma captivae Tecmessae,
id. C. 2, 4, 6; Quint. 2, 5, 12:neque, ut laudanda, quae pecuniam suam pluribus largitur, ita quae formam,
id. 5, 11, 26; 5, 12, 17.—Prov.:forma bonum fragile est,
Ov. A. A. 2, 113.—An outline, plan, design (of an architect, etc.):3.cum formam videro, quale aedificium futurum sit, scire possum,
Cic. Fam. 2, 8, 1: domus erit egregia;magis enim cerni jam poterat, quam quantum ex forma judicabamus,
id. Q. Fr. 2, 5, 3 (2, 6, 2):qua ludum gladiatorium aedificaturus erat,
Suet. Caes. 31.—A model after which any thing is made, a pattern, stamp, last (of a shoemaker), etc.:4.utendum plane sermone, ut numo, cui publica forma est,
Quint. 1, 6, 3:denarius formae publicae,
Sen. Ben. 5, 29; cf.: formas quasdam nostrae pecuniae agnoscunt, Tac. G. 5:formas binarias, ternarias et quaternarias, et denarias etiam resolvi praecepit neque in usu cujusquam versari,
stamped money, coins, Lampr. Alex. Sev. 39; cf. Curt. 5, 2, 11:si scalpra et formas non sutor (emat),
Hor. S. 2, 3, 106; cf.:forma calcei,
Dig. 9, 2, 5, § 3.—A mould which gives form to something:b.(caseus) vel manu figuratur vel buxeis formis exprimitur,
Col. 7, 8 fin.:formae in quibus aera funduntur,
Plin. 36, 22, 49, § 168; hence, a frame, case, enclosure:opus tectorium propter excellentiam picturae ligneis formis inclusum,
id. 35, 14, 49, § 173:formas rivorum perforare,
i. e. the conduits, pipes, Front. Aquaed. 75:aquaeductus,
Dig. 7, 1, 27.—Hence,Transf., the aqueduct itself, Front. Aquaed. 126.—5.A rescript, formulary (post-class., whereas the dimin. formula is predominant in this signif.):6.ex eorum (amicorum) sententia formas composuit,
Capitol. Anton. 6; so Cod. Just. 1, 2, 20.—Item forma appellatur puls miliacea ex melle, Paul. ex Fest. p. 83 Müll.II.Trop.A.In gen., shape, form, nature, manner, kind:B.ad me quasi formam communium temporum et totius rei publicae misisti expressam,
Cic. Fam. 3, 11, 4; cf.:formam quidem ipsam et tamquam faciem honesti vides,
id. Off. 1, 5, 14:innumerabiles quasi formae figuraeque dicendi,
id. Or. 3, 9, 34:cum, quae forma et quasi naturalis nota cujusque sit, describitur, ut, si quaeratur avari species, seditiosi, gloriosi,
id. de Or. 3, 29, 115; cf.:quae sit in ea species et forma et notio viri boni,
id. Off. 3, 20, 81:forma ingenii,
id. Brut. 85, 294:rei publicae,
id. Fam. 2, 8, 1; cf.:exemplar formaque rei publicae,
id. Rep. 2, 11:forma et species et origo tyranni,
id. ib. 2, 29:forma rerum publicarum,
id. Tusc. 2, 15, 36; cf. id. Rep. 1, 34 fin.:officii,
id. Off. 1, 29, 103:propositi,
Vell. 1, 16:sollicitudinum,
Tac. A. 4, 60:formam vitae inire,
id. ib. 1, 74:secundum vulgarem formam juris,
Dig. 30, 1, 111:scelerum formae,
Verg. A. 6, 626:poenae,
id. ib. 615.—In partic.1.In philos. lang., like species, a sort, kind: nolim, ne si Latine quidem dici possit, specierum et speciebus dicere; et saepe his casibus utendum est: at formis et formarum velim... Genus et formam definiunt hoc modo: genus est notio ad plures differentias pertinens;2.forma est notio, cujus differentia ad caput generis et quasi fontem referri potest. Formae igitur sunt hae, in quas genus sine ullius praetermissione dividitur, ut si quis jus in legem, morem, aequitatem dividat, etc.,
Cic. Top. 7, 31; cf.:genus et species, quam eandem formam Cicero vocat,
Quint. 5, 10, 62: a forma generis, quam interdum, quo planius accipiatur, partem licet nominare, hoc modo, etc.... Genus enim est uxor;ejus duae formae: una matrumfamilias, altera earum, quae tantummodo uxores habentur,
Cic. Top. 4, 14:quod haec (partitio) sit totius in partes, illa (divisio) generis in formas,
Quint. 5, 10, 63:duae formae matrimoniorum,
id. 5, 10, 62.—In gram.a.The grammatical quality, condition of a word:b.in quo animadvertito, natura quadruplicem esse formam, ad quam in declinando accommodari debeant verba, etc.,
Varr. L. L. 9, § 37 sq.; 101 sq. Müll.; Quint. 10, 1, 10.—The grammatical form of a word:utrum in secunda forma verbum temporale habeat in extrema syllaba AS an IS, ad discernendas dissimilitudines interest,
Varr. L. L. 9, § 109 Müll.:aeditimus ea forma dictum, qua finitimus,
Gell. 12, 10, 1. -
11 σχῆμα
A form, shape, figure, E. Ion 238, Ar.V. 1170, Pl.R. 601a, Thphr.Ign.52, etc.;καθ' Ἡρακλέα τὸ σ. καὶ τὸ λῆμ' ἔχων Ar.Ra. 463
;διερεισαμένη τὸ σ. τῇ βακτηρίᾳ Id.Ec. 150
;Ἱππομέδοντος σ. καὶ μέγας τύπος A.Th. 488
: in Trag. freq. in periphr., ὦ σ. πέτρας, = πέτρα, S.Ph. 952;σ. καὶ πρόσωπον εὐγενὲς τέκνων E.Med. 1072
;σ. δόμων Id.Alc. 911
(anap.), cf. Hec. 619; Ἀσιάτιδος γῆς ς. Id.Andr.1: in pl., of one person, φωτὸς κακούργου σχήματ' Id.Fr. 210; μορφῆς σχῆμα or σχήματα, Id. Ion 992, IT 292, cf. IG3.1417.14;τὴν αὐτὴν τοῦ σ. μορφήν Arist.PA 640b34
(but ἐν μορφῇ θεοῦ ὑπάρχων, opp. σχήματι εὑρεθεὶς ὡς ἄνθρωπος, Ep.Phil.2.6 and 8);τὰ σ. καὶ χρώματα Pl.R. 373b
;σχήμασι καὶ χρώμασι μιμεῖσθαι Arist.Po. 1447a19
; κατὰ χρόαν ἢ ὄγκον ἢ σ. [τοῦ προσώπου] Gal.18(2).309; ὅσα παθήματα γίνεται ἀπὸ σχημάτων caused by peculiar conformations, Hp.VM22.b atom, imagined as differing from other atoms mainly in shape,ἐκ περιφερῶν συγκεῖσθαι σχημάτων Democr.
ap. Thphr.Sens.65; ἐκ μεγάλων σ. καὶ πολυγωνίων ib.66, cf. 67,al., Od.64.2 appearance, opp. the reality, οὐδὲν ἄλλο πλὴν.. ς. a mere outside, E.Fr.25, cf. 360.27, Pl.R. 365c; show, pretence,ἦν δὲ τοῦτο.. σ. πολιτικὸν τοῦ λόγου Th.8.89
;οὐ σχήμασι, ἀλλὰ ἀληθείᾳ Pl.Epin. 989c
; σχήματι ξενίας under the show of.., Plu. Dio16, etc.3 bearing, air, mien, Hdt.1.60;τύραννον σ. ἔχειν S.Ant. 1169
; ἄφοβον δεικνὺς ς. X.Cyr.6.4.20; ταπεινὸν ς. ib.5.1.5; ὑπηρέτου ς. D.23.210;τῷ σχήματι, τῷ βλέμματι, τῇ φωνῇ Id.21.72
; ὄμμασι καὶ σχήμασι καὶ βαδίς ματι φαιδρός gestures, X.Ap.27, cf. Mem. 3.10.5; esp. outside show, pomp, τὸ τῆς ἀρχῆς ς. Pl.Lg. 685c; dignity, rank, οὐ κατὰ σ. φέρειν τι in a manner not dignified or seemly, Plb.3.85.9, cf. 5.56.1, Plu.2.44a, 631c, Luc.Peregr.25; πρεσβείας, ἱερείας ς., Aristid.1.490 J., Inscr.Olymp.941; ἔχει τι ς., c. inf., there's something to be said for.., E.Tr. 470, cf. IA 983; of the stately air of a horse, X.Eq.1.8,7.10.4 fashion, manner,ἑτέρῳ σ. ζητεῖν Hp.VM2
; σ. μὲν γὰρ Ἑλλάδος στολῆς ὑπάρχει fashion of dress, S.Ph. 223;σ. τοῦ κόσμου E.Ba. 832
, 1 Ep.Cor.7.31; σ. βίου, μάχης, E.Med. 1039, Ph. 252 (lyr.); τούτῳ.. κατῴκουν τῷ ς. Pl.Criti. 112d.b dress, equipment,ἀρχαίῳ σ. λαμπρός Ar.Eq. 1331
; βαβαιὰξ τοῦ ς. Id.Ach.64, cf. X.Oec.2.4, Theoc.10.35, App.BC1.16; τὸ τῆς πορφύρας ς., = Lat. latus clavus, IGRom.3.1422 ([place name] Prusias); ἐν τῷ σ. ἱερέ[ως] ib. 69.17 (ibid., cf. Glotta 14.80), cf.Sammelb.7449.10 (V A.D.), PLond.5.1729.25 (vi A.D.).5 character, role, μεταβαλεῖν τὸ ς. Pl.Alc.1.135d;πάντα σ. ποιεῖν Id.R. 576a
;ἐν μητρὸς σχήματι Id.Lg. 918e
, cf. 859a; ἀπολαβεῖν τὸ ἑαυτῶν ς. to recover their proper character, X.Cyr.7.1.49.6 character, characteristic propetry of a thing, [ πόλεως] Th.6.89; ; βάσιλείας σ. ἔχει the form of monarchy, Arist.EN 1160b25;τὸ σ. τῆς λέξεως δεῖ μήτε ἔμμετρον εἶναι μήτε ἄρρυθμον Id.Rh. 1408b21
(but τὰ σ. τῆς λέξεως the forms ( modes) used in poetry, such as entreaty, threat, command, Id.Po. 1456b9); τὰ τῆς κωμῳδίας ς. its characteristic forms, ib. 1448b36; ἐν σχήματι νόμου in form of law, Pl.Lg. 718b; ἐν ἀπολογίας ς. Isoc.15.8; ἐν μύθου ς. Arist.Metaph. 1074b2, cf. Pl.Ti. 22c; τὸ τῆς διαίτης ς. Gal.15.582;αἱ κατὰ σχήματα πυρετῶν διαφοραί Id.19.183
.7 a figure in Dancing, Ar.V. 1485: mostly in pl., figures, gestures (cf. σχημάτιον), E.Cyc. 221, Ar. Pax 323, Pl.Lg. 669d, Epigr. ap. Plu.2.732f, etc.;σχήματα πρὸς τὸν αὐλὸν ὀρχεῖσθαι X.Smp.7.5
; ἐν.. μουσικῇ καὶ σχήματα.. καὶ μέλη ἔνεστι figures and tunes, Pl.Lg. 655a; also of the postures of an athlete, Isoc.15.183: generally, posture, position, Hp.Off.11, al., Ar. Ra. 538(lyr.), Thphr.Lass.3,14; of the foetus, Sor.2.55; τὸ τῆς κατακλίσεως ς. the patient's attitude as he lies in bed, Gal.16.578, cf. 665; cf.σχηματίζω 11.3
.b Rhet., figure of speech, Pl. Ion 536c, Cic.Brut. 37.141, etc.; [ἡ τοῦ Θουκυδίδου φράσις] πλήρης σχημάτων D.H.Pomp. 5
, cf. Amm.2.2; for σ. Πινδαρικόν, etc., v. Hdn.Fig.p.100S.d τὸ σ. τῆς λέξεως, both the grammatical form of a sentence, Arist.SE 166b10, cf. Gal.16.709, etc.; and its rhythmical form, Arist.Rh.l.c. supr.6, etc.e grammatical form of a word, Hp.Vict.1.23, D.T.635.21, A.D.Pron.17.25,al.8 geometrical figure, Arist.de An. 414b20, al., Onos.10.28;μονωτάτη πάντων ἀριθμῶν δυὰς σχήματος οὐκ ἔστιν ἐπιδεκτική Theol.Ar.7
.d configuration of birds in augury, τοῖς τῶν γυναικῶν σχήμασι σῷ ζεσθαι to be saved by the configurations (of birds) appropriate to women, Gal.15.445.9 in Tactics, military formation, X.An.1.10.10.10 = τὸ αἰδοῖον LXXIs.3.17. -
12 drȗgъ
I. drȗgъ I Grammatical information: m. o Accent paradigm: c Proto-Slavic meaning: `companion, friend'Page in Trubačev: V 131-132Old Church Slavic:Russian:Czech:Slovak:Old Polish:Serbo-Croatian:drȗg `friend' [m o]Slovene:drȗg `companion, best man' [m o]Lithuanian:draũgas `friend' [m o] 4Latvian:dràugs `friend' [m o] 4Comments: Only Balto-Slavic and Germanic, cf. also Go. driugan `be up in arms'. I consider the connection with * dʰreugʰ- `deceive' dubious.Other cognates:Go. gadraúhts `warrior';OIc. dróttinn `prince, lord'II. drȗgъ II Grammatical information: adj. o Accent paradigm: c Proto-Slavic meaning: `other';Page in Trubačev: V 131-132Old Church Slavic:Russian:drugój `other' [adj o]Czech:druhý `second, other' [adj o]Slovak:druhý `second, other' [adj o]Polish:Serbo-Croatian:drȗg `second, other' [adj o];Čak. drȕgī (Vrgada) `second, other' [adj o];Čak. drȕgi (Orbanići) `other, second' [adj o]Slovene:drȗg `other' [adj o]Bulgarian:Comments: Etymologically identical with -> *drȗg I. -
13 ἀνήρ
ἀνήρ, ἀνδρόςGrammatical information: m.Meaning: `man' (Il.).Other forms: acc. ἄνδρα (Hom. also ἀνέρα, from where ἀνέρος etc.; on the inflexion s. Schwyzer 568β). Atano s. belowCompounds: As first member ἀνδρο-: - κμητος, κτασία; ἀνδραποδον s.v. - As second member - ήνωρ: ῥηξ-, φθεισ- (Hom.); in PN 'Aγ-, Myc. Atano \/Antānōr\/; fem. ἀντι-άνειρα, κυδι-. With - ανδρος: ἄν-, ἕλ-; PN esp. in Asia Minor and Cyprus: ` Ηγησ-, Τερπ-; Hom. Άλεξ-. For the question whether this name is really Greek cf. Myc. arekasadara \/Aleksandrā\/, kesadara \/Kessandrā\/ (note that Myc. -e- shows that this is a substr. name). So the forms are already Myc., but it is still not excluded that they are of non-Greek origin (s. Sommer Nominalkomp. 160ff.) - Kuiper MAWNed. NR. 14: 5 thinks that - ήνωρ and νῶρ-οψ contain an old abstract *ἄνερ, *ἄναρ `vital energy' (IE * h₂ner-; also in Skt. sū-nára- etc.).Derivatives: Demin. ἀνδρίον (Com.); from here, with unclear ντ-Suffix, ἀνδριάς, - άντος `statue' (Pi.), cf. Kretschmer Glotta 14, 84ff., Schwyzer 526: 3 u. 4. ἀνδρ(ε)ών m. `man's apartment' (Hdt.). -Abstracts: ἀνδρεία (- ηίη, - ία) `manliness, courage' (A.); ἀνδροτής, - τῆτος s.s.v. ἠνορέη `id.', Ion. for Aeol. ἀ̄νορέα (\< - ρία), (Kretschmer Glotta 24, 245f.), from a compound (cf. εὑανορία Pi.), s. Leumann Hom. Wörter 109f., 123 m. Lit.; - Adjec.: ἀνδρεῖος (Ion. ἀνδρήϊος, cf. Chantr. Form. 52, Schwyzer 468: 3) `manly, courageous', ἀνδρόμεος `human' (Il.; - μεος = Skt. - maya-?).Etymology: ἀνήρ is identical with Arm. ayr, gen. ar̄n `man', Skt. nā́ (stem nar-), NPhryg. αναρ, Ital. ner- in Osc. ner-um `virorum', Lat. Sab. Ner-ō etc. (s. W.-Hofmann s. neriōsus), W. ner `chief', Alb. njer `man'. - Not here Hitt. innar-, in innarau̯atar etwa `(Lebens)kraft, hoheitliche Macht'. - On δρώψ s.s.v. ἄνθρωπος. - Cf. νωρει̃.Page in Frisk: 1,107-108Greek-English etymological dictionary (Ελληνικά-Αγγλικά ετυμολογική λεξικό) > ἀνήρ
-
14 ἀνδρός
ἀνήρ, ἀνδρόςGrammatical information: m.Meaning: `man' (Il.).Other forms: acc. ἄνδρα (Hom. also ἀνέρα, from where ἀνέρος etc.; on the inflexion s. Schwyzer 568β). Atano s. belowCompounds: As first member ἀνδρο-: - κμητος, κτασία; ἀνδραποδον s.v. - As second member - ήνωρ: ῥηξ-, φθεισ- (Hom.); in PN 'Aγ-, Myc. Atano \/Antānōr\/; fem. ἀντι-άνειρα, κυδι-. With - ανδρος: ἄν-, ἕλ-; PN esp. in Asia Minor and Cyprus: ` Ηγησ-, Τερπ-; Hom. Άλεξ-. For the question whether this name is really Greek cf. Myc. arekasadara \/Aleksandrā\/, kesadara \/Kessandrā\/ (note that Myc. -e- shows that this is a substr. name). So the forms are already Myc., but it is still not excluded that they are of non-Greek origin (s. Sommer Nominalkomp. 160ff.) - Kuiper MAWNed. NR. 14: 5 thinks that - ήνωρ and νῶρ-οψ contain an old abstract *ἄνερ, *ἄναρ `vital energy' (IE * h₂ner-; also in Skt. sū-nára- etc.).Derivatives: Demin. ἀνδρίον (Com.); from here, with unclear ντ-Suffix, ἀνδριάς, - άντος `statue' (Pi.), cf. Kretschmer Glotta 14, 84ff., Schwyzer 526: 3 u. 4. ἀνδρ(ε)ών m. `man's apartment' (Hdt.). -Abstracts: ἀνδρεία (- ηίη, - ία) `manliness, courage' (A.); ἀνδροτής, - τῆτος s.s.v. ἠνορέη `id.', Ion. for Aeol. ἀ̄νορέα (\< - ρία), (Kretschmer Glotta 24, 245f.), from a compound (cf. εὑανορία Pi.), s. Leumann Hom. Wörter 109f., 123 m. Lit.; - Adjec.: ἀνδρεῖος (Ion. ἀνδρήϊος, cf. Chantr. Form. 52, Schwyzer 468: 3) `manly, courageous', ἀνδρόμεος `human' (Il.; - μεος = Skt. - maya-?).Etymology: ἀνήρ is identical with Arm. ayr, gen. ar̄n `man', Skt. nā́ (stem nar-), NPhryg. αναρ, Ital. ner- in Osc. ner-um `virorum', Lat. Sab. Ner-ō etc. (s. W.-Hofmann s. neriōsus), W. ner `chief', Alb. njer `man'. - Not here Hitt. innar-, in innarau̯atar etwa `(Lebens)kraft, hoheitliche Macht'. - On δρώψ s.s.v. ἄνθρωπος. - Cf. νωρει̃.Page in Frisk: 1,107-108Greek-English etymological dictionary (Ελληνικά-Αγγλικά ετυμολογική λεξικό) > ἀνδρός
-
15 μοιχός
Grammatical information: m.Compounds: Sometimes as 1. member, e.g. μοιχ-άγρια n. pl. `fine of one taken in adultery' (θ 332; after ζωάγρια, Chantraine Études 51 n. 3, cf. s.v.); also κατάμοιχος = μοιχός (Vett. Val.), prob. backformation from καταμοιχεύω (pap.).Derivatives: A. Several feminine-formations, most late: μοιχ-άς (Aeschin. Sokr.), - αλίς (LXX, NT, Hld.), also `idolatrous woman' (NT), -ή, - ίς (Ar. Byz.), - αινα (Tz.); older μοιχεύτρια (s. below). B. Adjectives: μοιχ-ίδιος `begotten in adultery' (Hecat., Hdt., Hyp.; after κουρίδιος, s. on κόρη), = - ικός (Ael.); - ικός (Luc., Plu.), - ιος (AP), - ώδης ( Kom. Adesp., Ptol.) `adulterous'. C. Nominal abstract formation: μοιχοσύνη = μοιχεία (Man.; poet. formation like μαχλοσύνη a.o., Wyss - συνη 71). D. Denominat.: 1. μοιχάω (orig. Doric; Gortyn. - ίω) `seduce to adultery, be ad.', of the man (the Lacedaimonian Callicratidas in X. HG 1, 6,15 [metaph.]), - άομαι `id.', of woman and man (LXX, NT), `be idolatrous' (LXX), `falsify' (Ael.; after Lat. adulterāre) ; 2. μοιχεύω = - άω, pass. `be seduced' (Xenoph., Att.), midd. - εύομαι `be adulterous' (Att. only of the woman, LXX also of the man); `idolate' (LXX); μοιχεία `adultery' (Att.), μοιχευ-τής = μοιχός (Man.), - τρια f. (Pl., Plu.); 3. μοιχ-αίνω (Vett.Val.); 4. - άζω (Anon. ap. Suid.) `id.' -- Details on the use in Wackernagel Hell. 7 ff. (= Kl. Schr. 2, 1038ff.), Schwyzer-Debrunner 235, also Blass-Debrunner $ 101.Origin: IE [Indo-European] [713] *h₃meiǵh- `urinate'Etymology: Nom. agentis of ὀμείχω `urinates' (s.v.) as vulgar and contemptible expression, s. Wackernagel Unt. 225 n. 1. The initial laryngeal (* h₃meigʰ-) was not vocalized before -o- (Saussure's law). -- Lat. LW [loanword] moechus.Page in Frisk: 2,249-250Greek-English etymological dictionary (Ελληνικά-Αγγλικά ετυμολογική λεξικό) > μοιχός
-
16 पृथक् _pṛthak
पृथक् ind.1 Severally, separately, singly; शङ्खान् दध्मुः पृथक् पृथक् Bg.1.18; Ms.3.26;7.57.-2 Different, separate, distinct; सांख्ययोगौ पृथग् बालाः प्रवदन्ति न पण्डिताः Bg.5.4;13.4; अवतीर्णो$सि भगवन् स्वेच्छोपात्तपृथग्वपुः Bhāg. 11.11.28; रचिता पृथगर्थता गिराम् Ki.2.27.-3 Apart, aside, alone; इति च भवतो जायास्नेहात् पृथक्स्थितिभीरुता V. 4.39.-4 Apart from, except, with the exception of, without; (with acc., instr., or abl.); पृथग् रामेण-रामात्- रामं वा Sk.; Bk.8.19. (पृथक् कृ1 to separate, divide, sever, analyse.-2 to keep off, avert.)-Comp. -आत्मता 1 severalty, separateness.-2 distinction, difference.-3 discrimination, judgment.-आत्मन् a. distinct, separate. -m. the individual spirit or soul (जीवात्मा); (opp. to universal spirit or soul); Mb.13. 12.8; Bhāg.8.24.3.-आत्मिका individual exist- ence, individuality.-करणम्, -क्रिया 1 separating, distinguishing.-2 analysing.-कार्यम् a separate or private affair; तेषां ग्राम्याणि कार्याणि पृथक् कार्याणि चैव हि Ms. 7.12.-कुल a. belonging to a different family.-क्षेत्राः m. (pl.) children of one father by different wives, or by wives of different classes.-चर a. going alone or separately.-जनः 1 a low man, an unenlightened, vulgar man, the mob, low people; न पृथग्- जनवच्छुचो वशं वशिनामुत्तम गन्तुमर्हसि R.8.9; Ki.1.4.24.-2 a fool, a block-head, an ignorant man; विविनक्ति न बुद्धिदुर्विधः स्वयमेव स्वहितं पृथग्जनः Śi.16.39.-3 a wicked man, sinner.-धर्मिन् a. one holding 'dual' (द्वैत) doc- trine; Mb.12.232.33.-पर्णी N. of a plant, Hemionitis Cordifolia (Mar. पिठवण).-पिण्डः a distant relation who offers the funeral rice-ball separately and not together with other relations; Ms.5.78.-बीजः the marking-nut (Mar. बिब्बा).-भावः separateness, indivi- duality; (so पृथक्त्वम्).-योगकरणम् the separation of a grammatical rule into two.-रूपः a. of different shapes or kinds.-विध a. of different kinds, diverse, various.-शय्या sleeping apart.-स्थितिः f. separate existence. -
17 सर्व _sarva
सर्व Pron. a. [सृतमनेन विश्वमिति सर्वम् Uṇ.1.151] (nom. pl. सर्वे m.)1 All, every; उपर्युपरि पश्यन्तः सर्व एव दरिद्रति H.2.2; रिक्तः सर्वो भवति हि लघुः पूर्णता गौरवाय Me. 2.-2 Whole, entire, complete.-र्वः 1 N. of Viṣṇu.-2 of Śiva.-र्वम् Water.-Comp. -अङ्गम् 1 the whole body.-2 all the Vedāṅgas. (-ङ्गः or˚रूपः) N. of Śiva.-अङ्गीण a. pervading or thrilling through the whole body; सर्वाङ्गीणः स्पर्शः सुतस्य किल V.5.11.-अधिकारिन् -m.,-अध्यक्षः a general superintendent.-अनुक्रमणिका, -क्रमणी a general index.-अनुदात्त a. entirely accent- less.-अन्नीन a. eating every kind of fodd; so सर्वान्न- भोजिन् &c.-अपरत्वम् final emancipation.-अभावः non- existence or failure of all; इतरेषां तु वर्णानां सर्वाभावे हरेन्नृपः Ms.9.189.-अभिसन्धिक a. deceiving every one; Ms.4.195.-अभिसन्धिन् m.1 a traducer, calumniator.-2 a religious hypocrite.-अभिसारः a complete army (of elephants, chariots, cavalry, and infantry).-अर्थचिन्तकः a general overseer, chief officer.-अर्थ- साधिका N. of Durgā.-अर्थसिद्धः the great Buddha or Śākyamuni.-अवसरः midnight.-अशिन् a. eating all sorts of food; Ms.2.118.-अस्तिवादः the doctrine that all things are real.-आकार (in comp.) entirely, thoroughly, completely; सर्वाकारहृदयंगमायास्तस्याः Māl.1.7; 1.14.-आत्मन् m.1 the whole soul; (सर्वात्मना entirely, completely, thoroughly.).-2 N. of Śiva.-आधारः a receptacle of everything.-आशयः, -आश्रयः N. of Śiva.-ईशः, -ईश्वरः 1 the Supreme Being.-2 a paramount lord.-उत्तम a. best of all, excellent, supremely good.-ऋतुपरिवर्तः a year; L. D. B.-ओघः = सर्वाभिसार above.-करः, -कर्मन् m. N. of Śiva.-कर्तृ m.1 N. of Brahman.-2 the Supreme Being.-कर्मीण a. performing every- thing.-कामः, कामदः, कामवरः N. of Śiva.-कामिक a.1 fulfilling all wishes.-2 obtaining all one's desires.-काम्य a.1 loved by all.-2 having everything one can desire.-कालीन a. for all time, perpetual.-केशिन् m. an actor.-क्षारः impure carbonate of soda or potash.-क्षित् a. abiding in all things.-ग a. all-pervading, omnipresent.(-गः) 1 Śiva.-2 the Supreme Being.-3 Brahman.-4 the spirit, soul. (-गम्) water.-गा the plant called प्रियङ्गु.-गामिन्, -गति a. all-pervading, om- nipresent.-गतिः the refuge of all.-ग्रन्थिः, -ग्रन्थिकम् the root of long pepper.-चारिन् m. N. of Śiva.-जनीन a.1 world-wide, famous.-2 relating to every one.-3 salutary to every one.-जित् a.1 excellent, in- comparable.-2 all-conquering, invincible. -m.1 death.-2 the 21st संवत्सर.-जीवः the soul of all.-ज्ञ, -विद् a. all-knowing, omniscient. (-m.)1 an epithet of Śiva.-2 of Buddha.-3 the Supreme Being.-ज्ञा N. of Durgā.-ज्ञातृ a. omniscient.-तन्त्रः one who has studied all the Tantras. ˚सिद्धान्तः a doctrine admitted by all the schools.-तापनः the god of love.-दः N. of Śiva.-दम, -दमन a. all-subduing, irresistible. (-m.) N. of Bharata, son of Duṣyanta; इहायं सत्त्वानां प्रसभदमनात् सर्व- दमनः Ś.7.33.-दर्शनसंग्रहः a compendium of all the schools or systems of philosophy by Mādhavāchārya.-दर्शिन् a. all-seeing. -m.1 a Buddha.-2 the Supreme Being.-दुःखक्षयः final emancipation from all existence.-दृश् a. all-seeing. f. (pl.) all organs of senses.-देवमय a. comprising all the gods. (-यः) N. of Śiva.-देवमुखः an epithet of Agni.-द्रष्टृ a. all-seeing.-धनम् (in arith.) the total of a sum in progression.-धन्विन् m. the god of love.-धारिन् m. N. of Śiva.-धुरीणः A beast carrying all burdens; a draught ox.-नामन् n. a class of pronominal words. ˚स्थानम् N. for the nom. (all numbers) and acc. sing. and dual of masculine and feminine nouns and nom. and add. pl. of neuter nouns; cf. सुट् also.-निक्षेपा a particular me- thod of counting.-निराकृति a. causing to forget every- thing.-पारशव a. made entirely of iron.-पार्षदम् a text book received by all grammatical schools.-पूर्णत्वम् complete preparation.-प्रथमम् ind. first of all.-प्रद a. all-bestowing.-प्रिय a. popular, liked by all.-बलम् a particular high number.-भक्षः fire.-भक्षा a female goat.-भवारणिः the cause of all welfare.-भावः all- being or nature; (सर्वभावेन 'with all one's heart, sin- cerely, heart and soul').-भावकरः, -भावनः N. of Śiva.-भृत् a. all-supporting.-मङ्गला an epithet of Pārvatī.-मांसाद a. eating every kind of flesh; मत्स्यादः सर्वमांसादस्तस्मान्मत्स्यान् विवर्जयेत् Ms.5.15.-मुख a. facing in every direction.-मूल्यम् A cowrie.-मूषकः 'all-stealing', time.-मेधः a universal sacrifice; राजसूयाश्वमेधौ च सर्वमेधं च भारत Mb.14.3.8.-योगिन् m. N. of Śiva.-योनिः the source of all.-रसः 1 the resinous exudation of the Sāla tree, resin.-2 salt, saltness.-3 a kind of musical in- strument.-4 a learned man. ˚उत्तमः salt.-लालसः N. of Śiva.-लिङ्गिन् m.1 an impostor.-2 a heretic.-लोकः the universe.-लोहः an iron arrow.-वर्णिन् a. of vari- ous kinds; खादिरान् बिल्वसमितांस्तावतः सर्ववर्णिनः Mb.14.88. 27 (com. वर्णिनः पलाशकाष्ठमयाः).-वल्लभा an unchaste wo- man.-वासः, -वासिन् m.,-विख्यातः, -विग्रहः N. of Śiva.-विक्रयिन् a. selling all kinds of things; Ms.2. 118.-वेदः a man who has studied the four Vedas.-वेदस् m. one who performs a sacrifice by giving away all his wealth; Ms.11.1. (-सम्) all one's property; उशन् ह वै वाजश्रवसः सर्ववेदसं ददौ Kath.1.1; चतुर्थे चायुषः शेषे वानप्रस्थाश्रमं त्यजेत् । सद्यस्कारां निरूप्येष्टिं सर्ववेदसदक्षिणाम् ॥ Mb.12.244.23.-वेशिन् m. an actor.-व्यापिन् a. all-pervading.-शक् a. omnipotent, all- powerful.-शान्तिकृत् m. N. of Śakuntalā's son, Bharata.-संस्थ a.1 Omnipresent.-2 all destroying.-सखः a sage; शान्तो यथैक उत सर्वसखैश्चरामि Bhāg.1. 85.45.-संगतः a kind of quick-growing rice. -a.1 appropriate in every respect.-2 met with universally.-संग्रहः a general or universal collection.-संनहनम्, -संनाहः assembling of a complete army, a com- plete armament; see-अभिसारः. -समता equality towards everything; स सर्वसमतामेत्य ब्रह्माभ्येति परं पदम् Ms. 12.125.-समाहर a. all-destroying.-संपन्न a. provid- ed with everything.-संपातः all that remains.-सरः a kind of ulcer in the mouth.-सह a. all-forbearing, very patient; स त्वं जगत्त्राणखलप्रहाणये निरूपितः सर्वसहो गदाभृता Bhāg.9.5.9. (-हः) bdellium. (-हा, also सर्वसहा) the earth.-साक्षिन् a. all-witnessing. (-m.)1 N. of the Supreme Being.-2 N. of wind.-3 of Agni.-साधनः Śiva.-साधारण, -सामान्य a. common to all.-सिद्धिः f. universal success. (-m.) the Bilva tree.-स्वम् 1 everything, the whole of one's pos- sessions; as in सर्वस्वदण्डः, सर्वस्वहरणम् 'confiscation of the whole property'.-2 the very essence, the all-in-all of anything; सर्वस्वं तदहो महाकविगिरां कामस्य चाम्भोरुह Subhāṣ.; see Ś.1.24;6.1; Māl.8.6; Bv.1.63.-स्वारः Vedic sacrifice (एकाह) in which the sacrificer commits suicide (usually a man suffering from some incurable desease with little hope of life); अननन्द निरीक्ष्यायं पुरे तत्रात्मघातिनम् । सर्वस्वारस्य यज्वानमेनं दृष्ट्वाथ विव्यथे । N.17.22.-हर a.1 appropriating everything.-2 inheriting a person's whole property.-3 all-destroying (as death); मृत्युः सर्वहरश्चाहम् Bg.1.34.-हरणम्, -हारः confiscating of one's entire property; सर्वहारं हरेन्नृपः Ms.8.399.-हितम् black pepper. -
18 regular
1. adjectiveregular customer — Stammkunde, der/-kundin, die
our regular postman — unser [gewohnter] Briefträger
get regular work — [Freiberufler:] regelmäßig Aufträge bekommen
have or lead a regular life — ein geregeltes Leben führen
2) (evenly arranged, symmetrical) regelmäßig3) (properly qualified) ausgebildet4) (Ling.) regelmäßig2. noun1) (coll.): (regular customer, visitor, etc.) Stammkunde, der/ -kundin, die; (in pub) Stammgast, der2) (soldier) Berufssoldat, der* * *['reɡjulə] 1. adjective1) (usual: Saturday is his regular day for shopping; That isn't our regular postman, is it?) gewöhnlich3) (occurring, acting etc with equal amounts of space, time etc between: They placed guards at regular intervals round the camp; Is his pulse regular?) regelmäßig4) (involving doing the same things at the same time each day etc: a man of regular habits.) regelmäßig5) (frequent: He's a regular visitor; He's one of our regular customers.) regelmäßig6) (permanent; lasting: He's looking for a regular job.) regulär7) ((of a noun, verb etc) following one of the usual grammatical patterns of the language: `Walk' is a regular verb, but `go' is an irregular verb.) regelmäßig8) (the same on both or all sides or parts; neat; symmetrical: a girl with regular features; A square is a regular figure.) regelmäßig9) (of ordinary size: I don't want the large size of packet - just give me the regular one.) normal10) ((of a soldier) employed full-time, professional; (of an army) composed of regular soldiers.) Berufs-...2. noun1) (a soldier in the regular army.) der Berufssoldat2) (a regular customer (eg at a bar).) der Stammkunde,die Stammkundin•- academic.ru/61226/regularity">regularity- regularly
- regulate
- regulation
- regulator* * *regu·lar[ˈregjələʳ, AM -ɚ]I. adj1. (routine) regelmäßigshe's a \regular churchgoer sie geht regelmäßig zur Kirchehe's a \regular contributor er spendet regelmäßig\regular appearances regelmäßiges Erscheinento make \regular appearances on TV regelmäßig im Fernsehen auftretento do sth on a \regular basis etw regelmäßig tunwe met on a \regular basis wir trafen uns regelmäßig\regular check-up regelmäßige Kontrolluntersuchung\regular customer [or patron] Stammkunde, -kundin m, f\regular exercise regelmäßiges Training\regular guest Stammgast ma man/woman of \regular habits ein Mann/eine Frau mit festen Gewohnheiten\regular income geregeltes Einkommen\regular meetings regelmäßige Treffento have \regular meetings sich akk regelmäßig treffen\regular price regulärer Preis\regular procedure übliche Vorgehensweise\regular working hours reguläre Arbeitszeiten2. (steady in time)\regular beat regelmäßiger Takt\regular breathing regelmäßiges Atmento keep \regular hours sich akk an feste Zeiten halten\regular intervals regelmäßige Abständeto eat \regular meals regelmäßig essen\regular service regelmäßige [Bus-/Flug-/Zug]verbindungto be \regular MED (of digestive system) eine regelmäßige Verdauung haben; (of menstruation) einen regelmäßigen Zyklus haben\regular features regelmäßige [o geh ebenmäßige] Gesichtszüge\regular quadrilateral gleichseitiges Viereck\regular teeth regelmäßige [o gerade] Zähneit's a pretty dress but too \regular es ist ein schönes Kleid, aber nicht ausgefallen genugher \regular secretary was off for a week ihre fest angestellte Sekretärin hatte eine Woche freimy \regular doctor was on vacation mein Hausarzt hatte Urlaub\regular gas AM Normalbenzin nt5. (correct) korrekt, ordentlich\regular work arrangements geordnetes [o ordentliches] Arbeitsverhältnisto do things the \regular way etwas so machen, wie es sich gehört\regular fries normale Portion Pommes Frites; (of clothing)\regular size Normalgröße f7. LING regelmäßig\regular conjugation regelmäßige Konjugation\regular verb regelmäßiges Verbthis child is a \regular charmer/nuisance dieses Kind ist ein richtiger Charmeur/Plagegeist10. soldier, officer Berufs-\regular troops Berufsheer nt11. REL\regular clergy Ordensgeistlichkeit f12.▶ as \regular as clockwork auf die Minute pünktlichII. n* * *['regjʊlə(r)]1. adj1) (= at even intervals) service, bus, pulse, reminders regelmäßig; footsteps, rhythm gleichmäßig; employment fest, regulär; way of life, bowel movements geregeltat regular intervals — in regelmäßigen Abständen
to be in or to have regular contact with sb/sth — mit jdm/etw regelmäßig in Verbindung stehen or Kontakt haben
his visits are as regular as clockwork — nach seinen Besuchen kann man die Uhr stellen
wanton violence is becoming a regular feature of urban life — vorsätzliche Gewalt wird immer mehr zum Bestandteil städtischen Lebens
eating fresh vegetables helps keep you regular ( Med inf ) — frisches Gemüse trägt zu einem regelmäßigen Stuhlgang bei
regular customer — Stammkunde m/-kundin f
his regular pub (Brit) — seine Stammkneipe (inf)
to have a regular partner — einen festen Partner haben; (in relationship also)
would you like regular or large? (esp US) — möchten Sie normal oder extra or (food also) eine extragroße Portion?
4) (= permissible, accepted) action, procedure richtigregular procedure demands that... — der Ordnung halber muss man...
it is quite regular to apply in person — es ist ganz in Ordnung, sich persönlich zu bewerben
5) (MIL) Berufs-, regulär; (POLICE) forces, officer regulär6) (REL)7) (esp US: ordinary) gewöhnlich8) (inf: real) echt (inf)2. n1) (MIL) Berufssoldat(in) m(f), regulärer Soldat, reguläre Soldatin; (= habitual customer etc) Stammkunde m, Stammkundin f; (in pub, hotel) Stammgast m2) (US: gasoline) Normalbenzin nt* * *regular [ˈreɡjʊlə(r)]A adj (adv regularly)a) Stammkunde m, -kundin f,b) Stammgast m;regular voter POL Stammwähler(in);at regular intervals regelmäßig, in regelmäßigen Abständen3. regulär, normal, gewohnt:regular business normaler Geschäftsverkehr, laufende Geschäfte pl;regularly employed fest angestellt, in ungekündigter Stellung4. gleichmäßig (Atmung etc):at regular speed mit gleichbleibender Geschwindigkeit5. regelmäßig, geregelt, geordnet (Leben etc):be in regular employment fest angestellt sein;regular habits pl eine geordnete Lebensweise6. genau, pünktlichregular session ordentliche Sitzung8. a) geprüft:a regular physician ein approbierter Arztb) richtig, gelernt (Koch etc)9. richtig, recht, ordentlich:10. umg echt, richtig(-gehend) (Gauner etc):a regular guy US umg ein Pfundskerl13. MILa) regulär (Truppe)b) aktiv, Berufs…:14. SPORT Stamm…:their regular goalkeeper auch ihr etatmäßiger Torhüter;make the regular team bes US sich einen Stammplatz (in der Mannschaft) erobern15. REL Ordens…:16. POL US Partei(leitungs)…B s1. AUTO US Normal n (Benzin)2. Ordensgeistliche(r) m3. MILa) aktiver Soldat, Berufssoldat mb) pl reguläre Truppe(n pl)4. POL US treue(r) Parteianhänger(in)5. umga) Stammkunde m, -kundin fb) Stammgast m:6. SPORT umg Stammspieler(in)reg. abk2. register (registered)3. registrar4. registry5. regular (regularly) regelm.6. regulation* * *1. adjective1) (recurring uniformly, habitual) regelmäßig; geregelt [Arbeit]; fest [Anstellung, Reihenfolge]regular customer — Stammkunde, der/-kundin, die
our regular postman — unser [gewohnter] Briefträger
get regular work — [Freiberufler:] regelmäßig Aufträge bekommen
have or lead a regular life — ein geregeltes Leben führen
2) (evenly arranged, symmetrical) regelmäßig3) (properly qualified) ausgebildet4) (Ling.) regelmäßig2. noun1) (coll.): (regular customer, visitor, etc.) Stammkunde, der/ -kundin, die; (in pub) Stammgast, der2) (soldier) Berufssoldat, der* * *adj.ausgesprochen adj.gleichmäßiger adj.normal adj.regelgerecht adj.regelmäßig adj.regelrecht adj.regulär adj. -
19 dě̀dъ
dě̀dъ Grammatical information: m. o Accent paradigm: aPage in Trubačev: IV 227Old Church Slavic:dědъ `forefather' [m o]Russian:Czech:děd `grandfather, forefather, old man' [m o]Polish:Serbo-Croatian:djȅd `grandfather' [m o];Čak. dȉd (Vrgada) `grandfather' [m o]Slovene:dẹ̀d `grandfather, old man' [m o], dẹ́da [Gens]Proto-Balto-Slavic reconstruction: deʔd-Lithuanian:dė̃dė `uncle' [m ē];dė̃dis `uncle' [m io]Latvian:dę̀ds `old man' [m o]Indo-European reconstruction: dʰeh₁dʰ-o-Page in Pokorny: 235Other cognates: -
20 dě̀verь
dě̀verь Grammatical information: m. jo Accent paradigm: a (c) Proto-Slavic meaning: `husband's brother'Page in Trubačev: V 19Russian:déver' `husband's brother' [m jo], dever'já [Nom p] \{1\}Old Czech:deveř `husband's brother' [m jo]Old Polish:Serbo-Croatian:djȅvēr `husband's brother, best man' [m o];Čak. dȉver (Vrgada) `husband's brother, best man' [m o];Čak. dȅver (Orbanići) `marriage witness' [m o]Slovene:dẹvę̑r `husband's brother' [m jo], dẹvȇrja [Gens];dẹ́ver `husband's brother, best man' [m o], dẹ́vera [Gens]Bulgarian:déver `husband's brother, best man' [m o]Proto-Balto-Slavic reconstruction: dáʔiuer-Lithuanian:díeveris `husband's brother' [m i] 1;dieverìs `husband's brother' [m i] 3aLatvian:diẽveris `husband's brother' [m io]Indo-European reconstruction: deh₂i-uer-IE meaning: husband's brotherCertainty: +Comments: In case-forms with original stress on the suffix one expects root stress as a result of Hirt's law. This accounts for the many indications for root stress in both Baltic and Slavic.Other cognates:Skt. devár- `husband's brother';Gk. δα̑ήρ `husband's brother'Notes:\{1\} AP (a) in Old Russian (Zaliznjak 1985: 138).
См. также в других словарях:
Grammatical number — Grammatical categories Animacy Aspect Case Clusivity Definiteness Degree of comparison Evidentiality Focus … Wikipedia
Grammatical gender — This article is about noun classes. For uses of language associated with men and women, see Language and gender. For methods of minimizing the use of gendered forms, see Gender neutral language. For other uses, see Gender (disambiguation).… … Wikipedia
Grammatical Revolution — Infobox Album | Name = Grammatical Revolution Type = Studio album Artist = GRITS Released = 1999 Recorded = Genre = Christian hip hop Length = Label = Gotee Records Producer = Reviews = Last album = Factors of the Seven (1998) This album =… … Wikipedia
Grammatical voice — In grammar, the voice (also called gender or diathesis) of a verb describes the relationship between the action (or state) that the verb expresses and the participants identified by its arguments (subject, object, etc.).When the subject is the… … Wikipedia
Grammatical modifier — In grammar, a modifier is an optional element in phrase structure or clause structure;[1] the removal of the modifier typically doesn t affect the grammaticality of the sentence. In English, adverbs and adjectives prototypically function as… … Wikipedia
Gender-neutrality in languages with grammatical gender — implies promoting language usage which is balanced in its treatment of the genders. For example, advocates of gender neutral language challenge the traditional use of masculine nouns and pronouns ( man , businessman , he , and so on) when… … Wikipedia
Dual (grammatical number) — Dual (abbreviated du) is a grammatical number that some languages use in addition to singular and plural. When a noun or pronoun appears in dual form, it is interpreted as referring to precisely two of the entities (objects or persons) identified … Wikipedia
Nombre Grammatical — Le nombre est, en grammaire et linguistique, un trait grammatical caractérisant certains lemmes comme les noms et adjectifs, les pronoms ainsi que les verbes. Dans le système nominal et pronominal, le nombre représente de manière plus ou moins… … Wikipédia en Français
Genre grammatical — Pour les articles homonymes, voir genre. Le genre, en grammaire et en linguistique, est un trait grammatical permettant de répartir certaines classes lexicales (noms, verbes, adjectifs, etc.) en un nombre fermé de catégories (les plus… … Wikipédia en Français
Nombre grammatical — Le nombre est, en grammaire et linguistique, un trait grammatical caractérisant certains lemmes comme les noms et adjectifs, les pronoms ainsi que les verbes. Dans le système nominal et pronominal, le nombre représente de manière plus ou moins… … Wikipédia en Français
Paul de Man — (December 6, 1919ndash December 21, 1983) was a Belgian born deconstructionist literary critic and theorist. He completed his Ph.D. at Harvard University in the late 1950s. He then taught at Cornell University, Johns Hopkins University, and the… … Wikipedia
